5WPR and Talent Resources have jointly released The Celebrity-Brand Fit Index, a 60-page research study that ranks eight consumer sectors on where celebrity-brand involvement creates durable commercial value and where it destroys it. The study is published at 5wpr.com/research/celebrity-brand-fit-index and at The Celebrity-Brand Fit Index | Talent Resources x 5WPR Research.
The report arrives at a moment when the celebrity-brand economy has restructured in ways most industry coverage has been slow to document. The global celebrity endorsement market crossed $3.4 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to $5.5 billion by 2032, according to the study. But the largest commercial events in the category over the past five years have not happened inside marketing budgets. They have happened in equity structures, acquisition transactions, and public offerings — outcomes in the hundreds of millions to billions of dollars where celebrities functioned as founders and operators rather than as paid spokespersons.
Hailey Bieber’s rhode sold to e.l.f. Beauty for up to $1 billion in 2025. SKIMS reached a $5 billion valuation after Goldman Sachs’ November 2025 investment round. Rare Beauty is valued at approximately $2.7 billion, with Selena Gomez holding around 51%. George Clooney’s Casamigos sold to Diageo for up to $1 billion in 2017. Ryan Reynolds sold Aviation Gin for up to $610 million. Dwayne Johnson’s Teremana Tequila is estimated at $3.5 billion. These are not endorsement fees. They are ownership outcomes in brands the celebrity actively built.
The ranking
The Fit Index ranks eight sectors on five variables — consumer receptivity, verified ROI, category fit, risk exposure, and whitespace — producing composite scores from 8.0 at the top to 3.4 at the bottom.
Spirits and Beverage tops the ranking at 8.0. Beauty is second at 7.8. Hospitality and Travel third at 7.6. Fashion (6.8), Consumer Packaged Goods (6.2), Health and Wellness (6.0), and Cannabis (5.8) occupy the middle and lower tiers. Financial Services andFintech ranks last at 3.4.
The 2.4-point gap between seventh-ranked Cannabis and eighth-ranked Fintech is the single largest gap in the ranking — wider than the gap between first and fifth. The report documents the structural reasons. Financial products are regulated, which creates direct legal exposure for celebrity participants: Kim Kardashian settled an SEC matter for $1.26 million in 2022 for promoting a crypto asset without disclosing a $250,000 payment, and the FTX celebrity equity cohort (including Tom Brady, Gisele Bündchen, and Stephen Curry) saw multi-million-dollar equity positions collapse to near zero following the exchange’s November 2022 bankruptcy. Consumer trust in financial institutions is structurally low. The vampire effect — where consumers remember the celebrity and forget the product — is especially acute in a category where the consumer is already suspicious of being sold something they cannot evaluate.
The downside matters more than it used to
The report also documents the widening of the category’s downside. Adidas’s €1.2 billion Yeezy inventory write-down after terminating its Kanye West partnership in October 2022 produced the company’s first annual loss in more than three decades and a 16% North American revenue decline. Crypto.com’s trading volume fell 88% over the twelve months following its Matt Damon “Fortune Favors the Brave” campaign. These are not marketing losses. They are enterprise-level strategic consequences of celebrity concentration that the category has been slow to price into deal economics.
What the report gives operators
The Celebrity-Brand Fit Index is published with the explicit goal of giving brand and talent leadership a structural framework they can apply to their own deal evaluation. The proprietary scoring model, the eight sector deep-dives, and the forward indicators covering 2026 to 2028 are intended as a working reference document, not a one-time read.
“Every brand I talk to asks which celebrity,” said Ronn Torossian, Founder and Chairman of 5WPR. “Almost none of them ask whether the category they are in rewards celebrity deployment at all. That is the first question, not the second. The Fit Index is the framework we built with Talent Resources so that question gets asked before the negotiation, not after the write-down.”
Michael Heller, Founder of Talent Resources, framed the talent-side implications: “The smartest talent deals of the next five years will not be endorsements. They will be equity partnerships in categories that reward founder-operator involvement. The Fit Index gives talentrepresentatives the structural framework for identifying those categories before the deal is structured.”
The report also identifies several developments likely to reshape the category over the next 24 to 36 months, including the rapid growth of AI-generated celebrity content (forecast as a $1.2 billion industry by 2027), the internationalization of the celebrity-founder model into Asia and the Middle East, continuing FTC and SEC enforcement activity, and the potential federal rescheduling of cannabis and its impact on the Fit Index score for that sector.
The full 60-page Celebrity-Brand Fit Index is available at 5wpr.com/research/celebrity-brand-fit-index.