Michigan Strategic Fund is seeking a market research firm for the 2017 Pure Michigan Campaign Insights Study The resulting study will identify the return on investment (ROI) of the regional and national 2017 Pure Michigan advertising campaign, and provide strategic marketing insights to guide the campaign’s targeting, branding, and communication efforts.
The successful research firm will be asked to address four key components of research, discussed further under “Scope of Work” on page five:
- Campaign impacts on Michigan
- Brand/advertising perception and awareness
- Traveler profiles and motivators
- Competitive assessment
- Sell Michigan as the ideal destination to U.S. markets
- Generate awareness of michigan.org as a travel planning tool
- National -- Travel marketing is designed to showcase what makes Michigan unique and to increase visitation to Michigan from more-distant markets outside the Great Lakes region.
- Regional markets – They include Chicago, Cleveland, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, Columbus, and Dayton.
- Feeder markets – Nearby markets that feed Michigan with high volumes of travel. They include Toledo, South Bend-Elkhart, Fort Wayne, Green Bay-Appleton, Minneapolis-St. Paul, and St. Louis
- Campaign impact on Michigan
- Brand/advertising perception and awareness
- Traveler profiles and motivators
- Competitor assessment
- Incremental Return on Investment (ROI) – This key metric looks at the difference between 1) state spending on the 2017 Pure Michigan campaign and 2) net-new spending from travel/tourism in the state as a result of the 2017 Pure Michigan campaign. The latter is a measurement of direct, indirect, and induced spending stemming from campaign-influenced travel/tourism by out-of-state residents (i.e. Michigan-resident travel within the state is excluded).
- Jobs – The jobs metric is an estimate of the number of jobs supported by any net- new spending in the state as a result of travel/tourism influenced by the 2017 Pure Michigan campaign.
- Taxes – Incremental taxes from which the state benefited stemming from any net- new, campaign-induced spending.
- Visitor trips – Net-new trips to the state influenced by the 2017 Pure Michigan campaign.
- What are the leading motivators with which the Pure Michigan campaign inspires out-of-state travelers/tourists? What travel motivators does the Pure Michigan campaign fail to inspire?
- What perceptions do both Michigan- and non-Michigan-travelers/tourists have of Michigan as a result of the campaign brand and advertisements?
- What are Michigan’s image strengths and weaknesses?
- What does the Pure Michigan traveler profile look like (i.e. age, sex, income, adventurer, foodie, etc.)?
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Ohio
- Wisconsin




