The aim of Frontline's coverage was to highlight the use of technology in schools, and how laptops and Google Docs were turning the Bronx school around. Great things to see how education is finally being implemented on a universal scale for this particular school. It was even a little funny to see how excited the students and teachers were about having accessible technology in the classroom. The teachers and students were excited for different reasons, though. On the one hand, the teachers were thrilled to see how well the students flourished in a technologically advanced classroom setting, as it enabled them to have real-time interaction with the teacher and go over answers with the entire class. The students, on the other hand, later admitted to using the accessible laptops to look at their MySpace pages and chat with their friends, though the school blocks access to sites such as MySpace and YouTube. The happy medium? Monitor the students' activity, at least while they're in the classrooms and supposed to be doing their work. Fair enough, by most standards. But maybe not so much when those teachers admit to spying on their kids. One teacher noted that a lot of the students keep their PhotoBooth application open on their laptops, and use it as a mirror to check their hair or makeup. To mess with his students, one teacher even took a photo of a female student that was doing just that. Creepy, yes. Even more disturbing was the lack of attention Frontline gave to this aspect of its coverage regarding the school's use of technology,as Gizmodo points out. Perhaps this Bronx school is looking for a lawsuit as well? In all fairness, the Bronx school appears to be more transparent with its use of programs for monitoring the student's activity. Many times they will gently nudge a student to get back to work if they see a student has too many distracting programs open on their laptop. The main objective is for the student to learn and get their work done, not to monitor each and everything they do. From the Frontline coverage, it actually appears that the students of this Bronx school are well aware of what their teachers are doing with their monitoring tactics, and defend themselves accordingly or admit defeat and simply get back to work. And maybe that's just the way things are going to be in educational environments so tightly linked to technology. As we've been reminded with the assassination of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, it's not always the spying cameras and surveillance that prevents the crime. Many of us have simply learned to live with a camera or program that is tracking our actions in the real and virtual realms. The real debate for this particular Bronx school and others like it will be whether or not students should be learning how to deal with such monitoring as part of their early education of technology within our society. Preparing students for the real world takes on an entirely new meaning when you look at it from this perspective, especially as the matter of privacy continues to become a topic of discussion regarding the regular use of social media outlets and the Internet at large. Adapting to the heightened level of real-time accountability is something the next generation will begin developing at a relatively early age, and that may be the consequence of our very permeating technology within our current culture.
Written by
Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces reporting, research, and analysis across thirty verticals — communications, reputation, AI visibility, public affairs, media systems, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
Editorial Team · 05/19/2026
How Finance Brands Win in the GEO Era
Someone deciding where to open a savings account used to begin with a search box. They typed "best high-yield savings account," opened a comparison page from NerdWallet or Bankrate, and read a ranked list with rates attached. The institutions on tha…
Editorial Team · 05/19/2026
How Beauty Brands Win in the GEO Era
Brands in the GEO Era — Beauty
Editorial Team · 05/19/2026
Why AI Systems Trust Certain Sources
Article explores the five mechanics that explain why AI systems trust certain sources over others, including identification, extractability, corroboration, recency, and independence. It explains why machine readability matters, why structured databases win, why corroboration builds retrieval confidence, and why forums and reviews are often favored by AI.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.