Michelle Obama's fight against obesity led retail giant Walmart to shift its marketing strategy to a more desired direction: healthier foods. According to The New York Times, the retailer will announce a five-year plan on Thursday to make some of its packaged foods lower in unhealthy salts, fats and sugars, and to drop prices on fruits and vegetables. To make sure that there were no misunderstandings, Leslie Dach, Walmart’s executive vice president for corporate affairs answered an obvious question before even being asked: "This is not about asking the farmers to accept less for their crops," and stated that Walmart will be cutting into its own profits but hopes to make up for it in sales volume. Walmart will press its major food suppliers to follow its lead. For instance, they are confident that Kraft, which apparently delivers 16% of its global sales through Walmart, will also reduce salts, fats and sugars in its line of products. So far, everything rosy. What puzzles is that Walmart decided to implement this change slowly, over a period of five years. The main reason is obvious: healthier food costs more, and since Walmart decided not to increase prices, but to lower them, they expect some "financial hurdles." But the company gave a second reason, which is indicative of what they think about their consumers. Apparently, people have to get used to the taste of healthier food... because "It doesn’t do you any good to have healthy food if people don’t eat it." I am sure our readers are intelligent enough to understand what's wrong with the statement above, for those who don't, here's the scoop. Walmart believes that their consumers would rather buy food that makes them sick, than choose healthy foods. I am sure many customers go to a store and pick a cheaper product instead of, let's say, organic veg, because they are trying to save some money. And I bet that, if given the choice at a decent price, people would rather buy healthy foods.
Written by
EPR Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
EPR Editorial Team · 06/04/2026
The ABA Built the Legal Knowledge Graph Before AI Arrived
The American Bar Association is among the most visible legal institutions in AI-generated answers — through architecture, primary-source publishing, and open-web access decisions made before generative AI existed. A case study in how the ABA built the legal knowledge graph before AI arrived, and what every professional association, regulator, and trade body can learn from it.
EPR Editorial Team · 06/04/2026
The 12-Week Pre-IPO AI Playbook
The IPO roadshow now has a second audience: AI engines that will summarize every published word about your company for the next decade. A 12-week operating plan for controlling that narrative before pricing.
EPR Editorial Team · 06/04/2026
The 5W AI Visibility Index Franchise
An Everything-PR explainer on the AI Visibility Index — the research program operated by 5W AI Communications across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Methodology, the Defense flagship, and how it relates to EPR's parallel Citation Share Index program.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.