Everything PR News
Insights & Strategy

Marketing Investments That Actually Generate ROI

EPR Editorial TeamEPR Editorial Team5 min read
Share
Marketing Investments That Actually Generate ROI

Five categories — PR, content, influencer, event, sponsorship — broken down through five companies that turned marketing spend into compounding enterprise value.

Most marketing spend is treated as a quarterly expense. Some marketing spend is treated as capital. The difference is whether the asset compounds.

Five U.S. consumer companies have done this at scale across the last decade — Dutch Bros in event marketing, YETI in content, Crocs in influencer collaborations, Celsius Holdings in sponsorship and distribution-as-marketing, and Oatly in brand voice. Each one bought a different category of marketing infrastructure. Each one is still drawing dividends.

Dutch Bros — events as customer-acquisition assets

Dutch Bros has built one of the loudest event-marketing machines in U.S. retail. "Buck for Kids" days. Annual giveaways. Drive-thru lines on Valentine's Day with employees handing out roses. Localized openings where the line wraps the block by 6 a.m. The events are not promotional. They are the product.

The financials: Dutch Bros went public in September 2021. By Q1 2026 the chain had 1,043 shops, $1.45 billion in 2025 revenue (+34% YoY), and same-store sales growth in the high single digits — a number U.S. quick-service chains have not posted in a decade. The CAC implied by paid media is a fraction of what Starbucks, Dunkin', or Tim Hortons spend on the same customer.

Event ROI in practice: Every Dutch Bros opening generates roughly six months of organic social content. Local TikTok, regional press, Instagram lines-around-the-block footage. The store opening is also the marketing campaign. There is no separate spend.

YETI — content marketing as product positioning

YETI is the case study every B2C marketing class now teaches. The brand spent a decade publishing long-form hunting and fishing films through YETI Presents — short documentaries with no logo placement, no product shots, just stories about people YETI's customers wanted to be.

The financials: YETI went public in October 2018. FY2024 revenue: $1.85 billion. Net income: $200M+. Gross margin north of 57% — a hardware company holding software-like margins. The brand commands premium pricing because the content turned a cooler into an identity object.

Content ROI in practice: YETI Presents films are evergreen. A short film commissioned in 2017 still gets cited, shared, and watched in 2026. That is asset behavior, not expense behavior. The same dollar spent on a Q3 paid social campaign is gone by Q4. The same dollar spent on a film is still compounding nine years later.

Crocs — influencer collaboration as brand expansion

Crocs was, by every reasonable analysis, supposed to be a dead brand by 2018. Then it became one of the most successful brand-collaboration playbooks in U.S. consumer marketing. Post Malone Crocs. Justin Bieber Crocs. Balenciaga Crocs. KFC Crocs. Salehe Bembury Crocs. Pringles Crocs. The collaboration list is now well into the hundreds.

The financials: Crocs revenue went from $1.05 billion in 2018 to $4.1 billion in 2024 — roughly 4x in six years. The stock returned more than 1,000% over the same period. Margins held above 55% gross. The collaboration program is the engine.

Influencer ROI in practice: Each high-profile collaboration is a paid-but-earned media event. The drop sells out, the resale market validates the pricing, and the social media coverage drives baseline-product purchases for the next six months. Crocs treats collaborators as paid media — sometimes literally — but the payment is recouped many times over in the brand-momentum tail.

Celsius Holdings — sponsorship and distribution as marketing infrastructure

Celsius spent years as a niche fitness-store energy drink before the marketing strategy locked in. Athletic sponsorships, fitness-influencer seeding, podium presence at CrossFit events, gym partnerships. None of it was glamorous. All of it compounded.

Then in August 2022, Celsius signed an exclusive U.S. distribution deal with PepsiCo — distribution itself as a marketing investment. PepsiCo paid for placement in convenience stores, gas stations, and chains that Celsius could never have reached alone.

The financials: Celsius FY2025 revenue hit $2.5 billion (a record), up from $1.32 billion in 2023. U.S. energy-drink market share reached 20.8% by Q3 2025. The company acquired Alani Nu (April 2025, ~$1.65B) and Rockstar Energy from PepsiCo (August 2025). PepsiCo's stake increased to 11% in a $585M strategic investment in mid-2025.

Sponsorship ROI in practice: Celsius treated distribution as marketing. The PepsiCo deal was simultaneously a supply-chain agreement and the largest media buy in the company's history. Every cooler at every gas station is paid placement. The category leadership followed.

Oatly — brand voice as a category-defining investment

Oatly's marketing strategy is the single most copied in beverage and CPG over the last decade. Hand-drawn packaging. Long, conversational copy. Anti-corporate self-deprecation that reads like a Substack post written by the founder. The brand voice is the marketing budget.

The financials: Oatly went public on Nasdaq in May 2021 at a $10 billion valuation. The stock collapsed. Years of unprofitable growth followed. But FY2025 marked Oatly's first full year of profitable growth in seven years, with $862.5 million in revenue, positive adjusted EBITDA, and 2026 guidance of 3–5% constant-currency growth with $25–35M adjusted EBITDA.

Brand-voice ROI in practice: Oatly's voice survived a stock crash, supply-chain collapses, two CEO changes, and a category slowdown. The voice itself is the asset that kept retail buyers carrying the product and consumers paying the premium. Most CPG brands could not have absorbed that much operational damage with brand intact.

Marketing as capital: the test

The pattern across all five is the same. A test any CFO can run before approving a marketing budget.

Test 1: Does the spend create an asset that exists tomorrow? A paid search campaign creates no asset. A YETI Presents film does. A Dutch Bros opening event becomes six months of social content. A Crocs x Post Malone drop becomes a Wikipedia entry and a resale market.

Test 2: Does the spend lower CAC next year? Celsius's PepsiCo distribution deal lowered customer acquisition cost permanently. Oatly's brand voice lowered the cost of every subsequent retail conversation. Marketing that does not lower future CAC is an expense. Marketing that does is capital.

Test 3: Would the company still own the marketing value if the team left tomorrow? YETI's films, Crocs's collaboration archive, Oatly's brand voice library — these survive any team change. Most paid media does not.

Three tests. One question. If marketing spend passes all three, it is not an expense. It is enterprise value the income statement is mislabeling.

Part of Everything-PR's marketing intelligence series.

EPR Editorial Team
Written by
EPR Editorial Team

The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.

Other news

See all

Most brands are invisible inside AI search. Is yours?

EPR publishes the data every week.

Free. Weekly. Unsubscribe anytime.