Recently, the Paris Agreement to combat climate change was approved as international law. The decision came even as those at the Paris Conference worry that the globe is heating up faster than originally expected. At present, 96 countries have signed onto the deal, which is one step in the attempt to limit global warming to less than two degrees Celsius.
Organizers hope that those 96 are just the beginning. Speaking to the media, Secretary General Ban-Ki Moon said, “Today we make history in humankind's efforts to combat climate change… We are still in a race against time. We need to transition to a low-emissions and climate-resilient future… Now is the time to strengthen global resolve, do what science demands, and seize the opportunity to build a safer more sustainable world for all.”
It was a rousing speech greeted warmly by most of the nation
al representatives in the room, but not by everyone, and certainly not by everyone in the countries represented at the conference. And this is the key distinction. Just because nearly 100 countries signed onto the deal doesn’t mean much. They still have to convince their people and, in many ways, work to change their cultures if they want to accomplish their goals.
When it comes to delivering a message, it’s not about how much one side believes it; it’s about how well they can articulate that to the other side and convince them to come to their way of thinking. They don’t need everyone, but they will need most of the people who are ambivalent as well as some of those who currently think climate change is bunk. More than that, though, these partisans will need to convince doubters that there’s a way to continue growing their economies and enjoying a first world existence without giving up their energy.
The U.S., Russia, and other world powers are not likely to look kindly on reducing carbon emissions, and there will be powerful groups out there trying to control the narrative to protect the status quo. Emerging economies like China and India are even more dependent on fossil fuels and carbon-emitting energy sources.
Supporters of the accord say they “know” a lot about what causes climate change and what could happen because of it. But, in the end, it doesn’t matter what they know, it doesn’t really even matter what they can prove. It only matters who they can convince.Editorial
By EPR Editorial Team2 min read
Climate change deal now international law, but can leaders sell it?
By EPR Editorial Team2 min read
Recently, the Paris Agreement to combat climate change was approved as international law. The decision came even as those at the Paris Conference worry that the globe is heating up faster than originally expected. At present, 96 countries have signed onto the deal, which is one step in the attempt to limit global warming to less than two degrees Celsius.
Organizers hope that those 96 are just the beginning. Speaking to the media, Secretary General Ban-Ki Moon said, “Today we make history in humankind's efforts to combat climate change… We are still in a race against time. We need to transition to a low-emissions and climate-resilient future… Now is the time to strengthen global resolve, do what science demands, and seize the opportunity to build a safer more sustainable world for all.”
It was a rousing speech greeted warmly by most of the nation
al representatives in the room, but not by everyone, and certainly not by everyone in the countries represented at the conference. And this is the key distinction. Just because nearly 100 countries signed onto the deal doesn’t mean much. They still have to convince their people and, in many ways, work to change their cultures if they want to accomplish their goals.
When it comes to delivering a message, it’s not about how much one side believes it; it’s about how well they can articulate that to the other side and convince them to come to their way of thinking. They don’t need everyone, but they will need most of the people who are ambivalent as well as some of those who currently think climate change is bunk. More than that, though, these partisans will need to convince doubters that there’s a way to continue growing their economies and enjoying a first world existence without giving up their energy.
The U.S., Russia, and other world powers are not likely to look kindly on reducing carbon emissions, and there will be powerful groups out there trying to control the narrative to protect the status quo. Emerging economies like China and India are even more dependent on fossil fuels and carbon-emitting energy sources.
Supporters of the accord say they “know” a lot about what causes climate change and what could happen because of it. But, in the end, it doesn’t matter what they know, it doesn’t really even matter what they can prove. It only matters who they can convince.Written by
EPR Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
EPR Editorial Team · 06/02/2026
Prosek Partners: Agency Profile
Prosek Partners is one of the top financial communications firms globally — nearly $120M in revenue, top-40 worldwide. Founded 1990 by Jen Prosek. Updated profile for 2026.
EPR Editorial Team · 06/02/2026
Why Speed Is No Longer the Crisis Communications Advantage
Speed was the crisis communications advantage for two decades. In 2026, speed without strategy is the most reliable way to make a bad situation worse. Seven rules for the brands that get this right.
EPR Editorial Team · 06/02/2026
The AI Visibility Audit: A 5-Step Framework for Measuring Citation Share
A five-step audit framework for measuring your brand's Citation Share across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Two to four hours. The baseline measurement that drives everything that follows.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.