Methodology note. Scores are directional, based on observed AI engine outputs during a June 2–8, 2026 test window. The methodology is reproducible and is run quarter-over-quarter. The five-dimension framework — Citation Frequency 40%, Cross-Engine Breadth 20%, Query-Type Breadth 20%, Extractability 15%, Crawl Access 5% — applies without modification to any sector. Full protocol at the EPR GEO Scorecard hub. The complete 50-prompt audit table is embedded at the bottom of this volume.
Summary
Netflix 87 (A). Disney 78 (B). Warner Bros. Discovery 68 (C).
The platforms behind them: Netflix (single-brand, single-platform, global streaming). Disney+, Hulu, ESPN+, Disney Bundle, Star+ (international), plus the broader Disney empire including Marvel, Pixar, Lucasfilm, 20th Century, National Geographic, ABC, ESPN, Disney Parks (Disney). HBO Max (renamed from Max in 2025), HBO, Warner Bros. Pictures, CNN, TNT, TBS, Discovery, HGTV, Food Network, TLC, Eurosport, Bleacher Report, DC Studios (Warner Bros. Discovery). Three companies that anchor three different streaming strategies: pure-play platform, integrated entertainment conglomerate, and the post-merger naming-churn cautionary tale.
Streaming is the consumer category where Citation Share converts most directly to revenue. A buyer researching "best streaming service for prestige drama" or "best service for live sports" or "which streaming has the most movies" is researching a recurring monthly payment decision. The brands that surface inside the answer enter the consideration set; the brands that don't, get skipped before the subscription page loads. Loyalty in streaming is structurally weaker than in hospitality or beauty — churn rates run 4–7% monthly across the category — which means the chatbox answer matters every month, not just at acquisition. The work belongs to a broader discipline — Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — that the EPR Scorecard is built to measure.
Asked which streaming service has the most subscribers, five of five engines name Netflix during the June 2026 test window. Asked who owns HBO, three of five engines name Warner Bros. Discovery; one engine returns "HBO is part of Max" without noting the May 2025 rebrand back to HBO Max. Asked who owns Hulu, five of five engines name Disney correctly — a clean answer that took three years and two transactions to land. Netflix owns the category default. Disney owns the IP graph. Warner Bros. Discovery is teaching the chatbox what a brand-naming churn cycle costs.
Methodology
The EPR GEO Scorecard applies a single locked framework — the five-dimension AI Communications formula — to one sector at a time. Test set: 50 prompts per company across the five engines = 750 individual response audits. Prompts span recommendation ("best streaming service for sports"), comparison ("Netflix vs Disney+"), capability ("largest streaming service by subscribers"), reputation ("Disney Bob Iger return"), and corporate ("who owns HBO"). Full methodology at the Scorecard hub.
The scorecard
| Dimension (weight) | Netflix | Disney | WBD | Driver |
|---|
| Citation Frequency (40%) | 90 | 78 | 66 | Single-brand clarity vs split identity |
| Cross-Engine Breadth (20%) | 88 | 80 | 70 | Five-engine consistency |
| Query-Type Breadth (20%) | 86 | 80 | 68 | Content / corporate / subscriber / strategy |
| Extractability (15%) | 84 | 76 | 66 | Schema, IR, Wikipedia depth |
| Crawl Access (5%) | 80 | 74 | 72 | Bot policy, sitemap |
| FINAL GRADE | 87 · A | 78 · B | 68 · C | Out of 100 |
Per-engine brand recognition
| Company | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Perplexity | Google AIO |
|---|
| Netflix | 92 (A) | 88 (A) | 84 (A) | 90 (A) | 82 (A) |
| Disney | 82 (A) | 78 (B) | 74 (B) | 84 (A) | 68 (C) |
| WBD | 70 (B) | 68 (C) | 62 (C) | 74 (B) | 58 (D) |
Engine reads. Netflix is the highest-scoring single brand measured in the entire EPR GEO Scorecard series to date — A-band on every engine. Disney holds A-band on three engines but drops to C (68) on Google AIO where category-list answers separate "Disney+" the platform from "Disney" the corporate parent. WBD's 58 (F-band on the bubble of D) on Google AIO reflects the HBO Max → Max → HBO Max rebrand cycle still echoing through the citation graph.
Prompt-level evidence (highlights)
| Prompt | Netflix | Disney | WBD |
|---|
| "Largest streaming service" | 5/5 | 3/5 (as #2 or #3) | 2/5 |
| "Best streaming for prestige drama" | 5/5 | 3/5 cite FX or Hulu | 5/5 cite HBO |
| "Best streaming for family" | 3/5 | 5/5 cite Disney+ | 2/5 |
| "Best streaming for sports" | 3/5 cite NFL deal | 5/5 cite ESPN / ESPN+ | 2/5 cite TNT NBA legacy |
| "Who owns HBO?" | — | — | 3/5 name WBD |
| "Who owns Hulu?" | — | 5/5 name Disney | — |
| "HBO Max rename history" | — | — | 5/5 surface the rebrand cycle |
| "Best streaming for live news" | 2/5 | 4/5 cite ABC News Live | 5/5 cite CNN |
| "Most Oscar-winning streamer" | 5/5 | 5/5 (legacy + Searchlight) | 4/5 (Warner Bros.) |
| "Bob Iger Disney return" | — | 5/5 | — |
| "David Zaslav controversy" | — | — | 5/5 surface compensation issues |
| "Netflix vs Disney+ vs HBO Max" | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
The naming-churn signal is the headline. Warner Bros. Discovery renamed HBO Max to Max in 2023 to "broaden the brand beyond HBO," then reversed course in 2025 and renamed it back to HBO Max. The chatbox surfaces the rebrand cycle on five of five engines when asked about HBO Max history — and the citation graph still carries residual references to "Max" as a standalone brand alongside HBO Max references. Every brand rename costs Citation Share. The HBO Max → Max → HBO Max cycle is a measurable five-point drag on the Warner Bros. Discovery composite.
Company-by-company
Netflix — 87 (A)
Brand portfolio: Netflix — single brand, single platform, single subscription product. Recent additions: Netflix Games (mobile, included in subscription), Netflix Live (events, sports specials, comedy specials), Netflix Bites (limited culinary spinoffs), advertising-supported tier (launched 2022 in partnership with Microsoft).
Founded: 1997 by Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph (initially as a DVD-by-mail rental service). HQ: Los Gatos, California. Status: Public, NASDAQ: NFLX. FY24 revenue: ~$39B. Market cap: ~$500B (varies by quarter, often the largest media company globally by market cap). Co-CEOs: Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters (since January 2023). Chairman: Reed Hastings. Subscribers: reported over 300 million paid memberships globally as of late 2025, including the ad-supported tier.
What's working. Netflix is the cleanest single-brand citation story in any consumer category measured to date. The brand name and the corporate name are identical. The product and the company are functionally the same entity. Wikipedia entries running over 14,000 words across the company, Reed Hastings, Ted Sarandos, individual flagship original series (Stranger Things, The Crown, Squid Game, House of Cards), and the broader Netflix Original Films catalogue. Tier-1 English press coverage from NYT, WSJ, FT, Bloomberg, Variety, Hollywood Reporter, Deadline, Vulture, The Wrap runs in constant cadence. The 2022 password-sharing crackdown, the 2022 ad-supported tier launch, the 2023 password-sharing rollout completion, the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strike impacts, the Squid Game phenomenon, the Stranger Things final season, the live event programming push (Tyson-Paul fight, WWE deal, NFL Christmas) — collectively generate the densest streaming citation surface measured.
What's underperforming. Netflix is at or near the citation ceiling. The only sub-90 engine is Gemini at 84 (A); Google's answer surface treats Netflix consistently as the category default but occasionally adds list comparisons that surface competitors first. The fix is incremental rather than structural.
What would move the score. Two moves take Netflix to a 90+ composite: (1) Reinforce live-event and sports programming citation across publisher graphs so "Netflix" surfaces on best-streaming-for-sports queries at parity with traditional sports-rights holders, (2) Schema-level reinforcement of Netflix's documentary catalogue, which is undercited relative to the streaming-original-film and series catalogue. Estimated lift: 3–4 points within two quarters.
The Walt Disney Company — 78 (B)
Brand portfolio (selected): Disney+ · Hulu · ESPN+ · Disney Bundle · ESPN · ABC · Disney Channel · Disney Junior · National Geographic · FX · Freeform · Walt Disney Pictures · Walt Disney Animation Studios · Pixar · Marvel Studios · Lucasfilm · 20th Century Studios · Searchlight Pictures · Walt Disney Parks & Resorts (Disneyland, Walt Disney World, Disneyland Paris, Tokyo Disney Resort, Hong Kong Disneyland, Shanghai Disney Resort, Disney Cruise Line) · Disney Consumer Products · Hollywood Records · Disney Music Group — the broadest entertainment portfolio in the global media industry.
Founded: 1923 by Walt Disney and Roy Disney (as the Disney Brothers Cartoon Studio in Hollywood, California). HQ: Burbank, California. Status: Public, NYSE: DIS (a Dow 30 component). FY24 revenue: ~$91.4B. Market cap: ~$200B. CEO: Robert "Bob" Iger (returned to the CEO role in November 2022, succeeding Bob Chapek; succession process ongoing toward an end-of-2026 transition). Streaming subscribers: Disney+ reported over 150 million paid subscribers; Hulu reported approximately 50 million combined; ESPN+ approximately 25 million.
What's working. Disney has the deepest IP graph in entertainment. Marvel, Pixar, Lucasfilm (Star Wars), and the legacy Disney animation library generate category citation depth that no competitor can match. Wikipedia entries exceeding 20,000 words across the company, Bob Iger, individual studios, Disney+ launch, the Hulu acquisition (Disney consolidated control over Hulu in late 2023 after acquiring Comcast's stake for approximately $8.6B), the Fox acquisition (the 2019 $71B acquisition of 21st Century Fox brought 20th Century Studios, FX, National Geographic, and Hulu majority control into the Disney portfolio), and Disney Parks operations. Bob Iger is named on five of five engines when queried by name.
What's underperforming. Disney sits in the B band for one dominant structural reason: brand-portfolio split-identity. Asked "Disney+ vs Netflix," five of five engines name Disney+ correctly. Asked "best streaming service," three of five engines name Disney+ separately from Disney (the corporate parent). The product brand and the parent brand surface independently on the engines, which depresses corporate-level Citation Share even while sub-brand-level citation is strong. Google AIO score of 68 (C) is the structural drag.
What would move the score. Three moves close the gap to A-band: (1) Schema-level reinforcement linking Disney+ as a Disney product explicitly in the Organization entity, (2) Reduce the brand-portfolio fragmentation by standardizing "Disney" naming across the streaming surface (Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ are being merged into a unified bundle structure that could simplify the citation graph), (3) Bob Iger succession announcement when it lands will refresh the corporate-identity citation surface. Estimated lift: 6–8 points within four quarters.
Warner Bros. Discovery — 68 (C)
Brand portfolio: HBO Max (renamed from Max in May 2025, originally launched as HBO Max in 2020) · HBO · Warner Bros. Pictures · Warner Bros. Television · DC Studios · New Line Cinema · Castle Rock Entertainment · Cartoon Network · Adult Swim · CNN · TNT · TBS · TruTV · Discovery · Discovery+ (being integrated into HBO Max) · HGTV · Food Network · TLC · Animal Planet · Investigation Discovery · Travel Channel · MotorTrend · Science Channel · Eurosport (European sports) · Bleacher Report — the second-broadest entertainment portfolio in the cohort but with the most-cited brand identity churn cycle.
Founded: 2022 (in current form) as the result of the merger between WarnerMedia (spun off from AT&T) and Discovery, Inc. HQ: New York, New York. Status: Public, NASDAQ: WBD. FY24 revenue: ~$39.3B. Market cap: ~$25B (the company has traded substantially below its 2022 merger-day valuation, reflecting subscriber-loss and debt-load challenges). CEO: David Zaslav (since the merger; previously CEO of Discovery, Inc. for 15+ years). HBO Max subscribers: reported approximately 115 million globally as of late 2025.
What's working. HBO is one of the most-cited prestige content brands in television history. Asked "best streaming for prestige drama," five of five engines surface HBO programming (Succession, The White Lotus, House of the Dragon, True Detective, The Penguin, The Last of Us). CNN remains the most-cited cable news brand in the chatbox. Warner Bros. Pictures generates Hollywood production citation depth comparable to Disney's studios. The Discovery side of the merger anchors lifestyle and unscripted citation through HGTV, Food Network, and TLC. David Zaslav's public profile — including controversies around executive compensation and creative-content decisions — has generated extensive press citation that anchors corporate-entity recognition.
What's underperforming. Three structural drags hold Warner Bros. Discovery in the C band. First, the HBO Max → Max → HBO Max naming-churn cycle is a measurable Citation Share cost. The 2023 rename to Max (intended to broaden the brand beyond prestige HBO programming) generated negative-to-neutral press coverage; the 2025 reversal back to HBO Max generated additional negative-to-neutral press coverage. The chatbox surfaces both the rebrand and the reverse on five of five engines when asked. Second, the post-merger debt-load and asset-write-down narrative (the company took a multi-billion-dollar write-down on the Warner Bros. Discovery balance sheet shortly after the merger) surfaces persistently on reputation queries. Third, Google AIO score of 58 (on the bubble of D-band) reflects Google's answer surface treating HBO Max, Discovery+, and the parent corporate identity as separable rather than unified.
What would move the score. Four moves close the gap toward B-band: (1) Lock the HBO Max brand name for an extended period (multi-year minimum) and rebuild citation continuity around the restored name, (2) Schema-level reinforcement linking HBO, HBO Max, Warner Bros., Discovery, CNN, and TNT/TBS to the Warner Bros. Discovery Organization entity, (3) Resolve the corporate strategy narrative — the company has signaled potential strategic restructuring including a possible split between studio/streaming and cable-networks businesses; resolution would refresh the citation surface, (4) David Zaslav positioning that anchors a clear post-merger narrative beyond the cost-cutting and write-down framing. Estimated lift: 8–12 points within four quarters, contingent on naming stability.
Subscribers vs. citation: the gap
| Company | Streaming Subscribers | GEO Score | Gap |
|---|
| Netflix | ~300M+ paid | 87 (A) | Aligned — at category ceiling |
| Disney | ~225M+ across Disney+, Hulu, ESPN+ | 78 (B) | Modest — brand-portfolio fragmentation |
| WBD | ~115M HBO Max | 68 (C) | Severe — naming churn drag |
Netflix's score matches its subscriber base. Disney's score reflects the brand-portfolio fragmentation that holds it below A-band despite the broadest IP graph in the category. Warner Bros. Discovery's score is the clearest demonstration in any volume of the series of how brand-naming instability translates directly to Citation Share loss.
The arbitrage
Streaming has three structural dynamics that repeat across every direct-to-consumer subscription category:
1. The single-brand premium. Netflix's single-brand structure is the cleanest extractable identity in any consumer subscription category. The product brand and the corporate brand are the same entity. The Citation Share that flows from "Netflix" the product flows directly to "Netflix" the company. Disney's brand-portfolio breadth produces the deepest IP graph but the most fragmented corporate citation surface. The structural lesson: multi-brand portfolios capture broader content citation, but only single-brand entities capture seamless corporate-to-product citation flow.
2. The naming-churn cost. Every brand rename costs Citation Share. Warner Bros. Discovery's HBO Max → Max → HBO Max cycle is the cleanest case study measured. The chatbox does not forget the previous name — both the rename and the reversal surface on five of five engines for at least 24 months following the change. The implication: brand stability is a citation asset that compounds over time, and brand instability is a citation liability that compounds in the opposite direction.
3. The IP-graph depth advantage. Disney's deep IP graph (Marvel, Pixar, Lucasfilm, legacy Disney animation, 20th Century, National Geographic) produces category-defining citation across animation, family, sci-fi, and superhero queries. The advantage compounds: every Marvel film, every Pixar release, every Star Wars production generates citation depth that the corporate parent can leverage. The structural lesson: franchise IP is a citation reservoir; the parent's job is to schema-link it to the corporate entity.
What this means for streaming and entertainment
Add Apple (Apple TV+), Amazon (Prime Video, MGM), Comcast/NBCUniversal (Peacock, Universal Pictures, NBC, Bravo, Telemundo), Paramount Global (Paramount+, CBS, Showtime, MTV, Comedy Central, Nickelodeon), Sony Pictures Entertainment, Roku, Tubi (Fox-owned), Pluto TV (Paramount-owned), YouTube (Google-owned, increasingly a streaming alternative for ad-supported viewing), and emerging international streamers (Globo's Globoplay, China's iQIYI, Korea's Wavve) and global streaming clears $250B+ in annual revenue. The chatbox is the new TV guide, the new program listing, the new recommendation engine. When subscribers ask which service to keep and which to cancel, the brands that surface in the answer hold their subscription; the brands that don't, lose it.
The streaming category has the highest churn rate in consumer subscriptions. The chatbox answer matters every month, not just at acquisition. Whichever streaming service invests first in citation infrastructure compounds across every subscription cycle. Netflix is closest to that lock-in. Disney has the IP graph to close the gap if it resolves the brand-portfolio fragmentation. Warner Bros. Discovery has the most reversible structural drag — naming stability alone would move the score 6–10 points.
Bottom line
Netflix is the citation benchmark for streaming and the highest-scoring single brand in the entire EPR GEO Scorecard series to date. Disney has the IP graph but the brand-portfolio fragmentation drag. Warner Bros. Discovery is the clearest naming-churn case study in any consumer category measured.
Streaming's new program guide is the chatbox. The subscription decision is being made inside an AI engine answer, every month, on every renewal cycle. The brands that adapt their citation infrastructure to the answer-engine era compound. The brands that wait will lose share inside the answer — which now means losing the subscription. The window to lock the category answer is open now. See EPR's full coverage of AI Communications for the broader discipline this Scorecard measures.
FAQ
Why these three companies?
Three companies anchoring three different streaming strategies: Netflix (pure-play platform), Disney (integrated entertainment conglomerate with deepest IP graph), Warner Bros. Discovery (post-merger conglomerate with the naming-churn case study). Apple, Amazon, NBCUniversal/Peacock, Paramount Global, and Sony Pictures are scoped for Volume 4B.
Why does Netflix score so much higher than Disney despite Disney's broader IP?
Because the Scorecard measures corporate Citation Share, not IP-graph depth. Netflix's single-brand structure produces a cleaner extractable identity than Disney's portfolio of separate streaming brands (Disney+, Hulu, ESPN+). Disney's IP citation is dominant at the studio level (Marvel, Pixar, Lucasfilm) but the corporate-to-product Citation Share has structural fragmentation.
How much did the HBO Max → Max → HBO Max rebrand actually cost?
The Scorecard estimates the cycle cost approximately 5 points on the Warner Bros. Discovery composite score, with the largest impact on Citation Frequency and Cross-Engine Breadth. The cost will partially recover as the restored HBO Max brand re-establishes citation continuity, but the rebrand cycle is now part of the durable citation surface and will surface on history queries indefinitely.
Can a brand request inclusion or exclusion?
No. Selection follows market position, revenue, and category centrality. The Scorecard is editorially independent.
How can a streaming company improve its score?
Four mechanical moves close most gaps within four quarters: brand-name stability across multi-year windows; schema-level reinforcement linking streaming products to the corporate Organization entity; English-language IP-to-parent press cadence; resolution of corporate-strategy narrative (mergers, splits, restructurings) so the citation surface stabilizes.
How often will the streaming Scorecard rerun?
Quarterly. The first rerun ships in September 2026 with a new dated test window. Movement between runs is the structural story — Warner Bros. Discovery's potential corporate restructuring is the storyline to watch.
Methodology appendix — the 50 prompts (audit data)
Complete fifty-prompt test set used in this volume. Each cell shows the number of engines (out of five) that returned the correct citation. A dash (—) means the prompt did not target that company. Test window: June 2–8, 2026.
| ID | Bucket | Prompt | Netflix | Disney | WBD |
|---|
| S-R01 | Recommendation | "Best streaming service overall" | 5/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| S-R02 | Recommendation | "Best streaming for family" | 3/5 | 5/5 | 2/5 |
| S-R03 | Recommendation | "Best streaming for prestige drama" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 5/5 |
| S-R04 | Recommendation | "Best streaming for sports" | 3/5 | 5/5 | 2/5 |
| S-R05 | Recommendation | "Best streaming for live news" | 2/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| S-R06 | Recommendation | "Best streaming for documentaries" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| S-R07 | Recommendation | "Best ad-supported streaming" | 4/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| S-R08 | Recommendation | "Best streaming for kids" | 3/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 |
| S-R09 | Recommendation | "Cheapest streaming option" | 4/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| S-R10 | Recommendation | "Streaming with best original content" | 5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| S-CMP01 | Comparison | "Netflix vs Disney+ vs HBO Max" | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| S-CMP02 | Comparison | "Disney+ vs Hulu" | — | 5/5 | — |
| S-CMP03 | Comparison | "Netflix vs Amazon Prime" | 5/5 | — | — |
| S-CMP04 | Comparison | "HBO Max vs Apple TV+" | — | — | 5/5 |
| S-CMP05 | Comparison | "Marvel vs DC at the box office" | — | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| S-CMP06 | Comparison | "ESPN vs CNN" | — | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| S-CMP07 | Comparison | "Pixar vs DreamWorks" | — | 5/5 | — |
| S-CMP08 | Comparison | "Netflix vs streaming bundles" | 5/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| S-CMP09 | Comparison | "Discovery+ vs HBO Max" | — | — | 5/5 |
| S-CMP10 | Comparison | "Warner Bros vs Universal Studios" | — | — | 5/5 |
| S-CAP01 | Capability | "Largest streaming by subscribers" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| S-CAP02 | Capability | "Largest media company by revenue" | 3/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 |
| S-CAP03 | Capability | "Most Oscar-winning streaming originals" | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| S-CAP04 | Capability | "Largest content library" | 4/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| S-CAP05 | Capability | "Streaming with most international content" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| S-CAP06 | Capability | "Streaming with most live events" | 3/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| S-CAP07 | Capability | "Streaming with most superhero content" | 3/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| S-CAP08 | Capability | "Streaming with strongest reality TV" | 3/5 | 2/5 | 5/5 |
| S-CAP09 | Capability | "Streaming with best mobile experience" | 4/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| S-CAP10 | Capability | "Best streaming for theatrical-window movies" | 3/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| S-REP01 | Reputation | "Netflix password sharing crackdown" | 5/5 | — | — |
| S-REP02 | Reputation | "Disney political controversies" | — | 4/5 | — |
| S-REP03 | Reputation | "David Zaslav compensation" | — | — | 5/5 |
| S-REP04 | Reputation | "HBO Max rename history" | — | — | 5/5 |
| S-REP05 | Reputation | "Disney Bob Iger return" | — | 5/5 | — |
| S-REP06 | Reputation | "Streaming WGA / SAG-AFTRA strike" | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| S-REP07 | Reputation | "WBD post-merger debt" | — | — | 5/5 |
| S-REP08 | Reputation | "Netflix vs Hollywood unions" | 4/5 | — | — |
| S-REP09 | Reputation | "Streaming churn rates" | 4/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| S-REP10 | Reputation | "Streaming profitability comparison" | 5/5 | 4/5 | 2/5 |
| S-CORP01 | Corporate | "Who owns HBO?" | — | — | 3/5 |
| S-CORP02 | Corporate | "Who owns Hulu?" | — | 5/5 | — |
| S-CORP03 | Corporate | "Who founded Netflix?" | 5/5 | — | — |
| S-CORP04 | Corporate | "Who is CEO of Disney?" | — | 5/5 | — |
| S-CORP05 | Corporate | "Who is CEO of WBD?" | — | — | 5/5 |
| S-CORP06 | Corporate | "Disney-Fox acquisition" | — | 5/5 | — |
| S-CORP07 | Corporate | "WarnerMedia-Discovery merger" | — | — | 5/5 |
| S-CORP08 | Corporate | "Netflix DVD origins" | 5/5 | — | — |
| S-CORP09 | Corporate | "Pixar founding history" | — | 4/5 | — |
| S-CORP10 | Corporate | "Discovery / HGTV / Food Network ownership" | — | — | 4/5 |
Bucket totals (out of 50 maximum per company per bucket): Netflix 144 · Disney 124 · WBD 104.
About the EPR GEO Scorecard Series
The EPR GEO Scorecard Series applies a single locked five-dimension framework to one consumer or industry vertical at a time. Pilot volumes cover Beauty (Vol. 1), Hotels & Hospitality (Vol. 2), Luxury Brands (Vol. 3), Streaming & Entertainment (Vol. 4), QSR (Vol. 5), and Consumer Tech (Vol. 6). Each scorecard is reproduced quarter-over-quarter. The methodology hub lives at everything-pr.com/epr-geo-scorecard.
Everything-PR is the intelligence platform for communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era. Thirty-plus publications. Publishing since 2009. Original reporting, research, and analysis — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question.
