New Study Shows Pricing Discrepancy Online Vs. In-Store
By EPR Editorial Team1 min read
Where would you rather buy? Online, or in store? If undecided, a new study by Anthem Marketing Solutions may offer some answers. The study found changing patterns in online and offline pricing. When compared, items with prices below $15 were cheaper in store, and those priced above $15 were generally cheaper online. Anthem Marketing Solutions conducted a similar study in the Fall of 2010, when they found that items below $50 were often cheaper in-store. But the trend changed, and the online items appear now to generate more savings than items that you could buy at a normal retail shop. Anthem’s new study was focused on a typical basket of consumer household purchases. The items compared online and in store were the same size, packaging and model number. The prices were recorded across a total of sixteen online and offline retailers on a single day, independent of applicable taxes or shipping fees. The study is important for consumers to understand how to make the most out of their purchase, but also for marketers, to understand the forces driving consumer behavior. To remain competitive, retailers must optimize channel pricing, and ensure profitability, through more enticing and convenient shipping deals. The study suggests that physical stores may also see a benefit of increasing the online profitability of low-priced items. More information about the study, and other attractive offers, at Anthem.

Other news
See all
The GEO Stack: Schema, Entity, Citation, Authority — In That Order
The GEO Stack is a four-layered approach to building online visibility and authority for AI-era content. It emphasizes the importance of Schema, Entity, Citation, and Authority, in that specific order, for effective compounding and client-side scrutiny. This methodology, though relatively new, offers a clear framework for optimizing content to be understood and surfaced by search and AI engines.

Why Wikipedia, Reddit, and Substack Outrank Forbes in AI Retrieval
Forbes is the most coveted earned-media placement in B2B PR. In citation testing, Reddit beats it for ChatGPT brand citation share by a factor of 2.4x. This article explores why Wikipedia, Reddit, and Substack are outranking Forbes in AI retrieval and what it means for earned media strategy.

LLM Citation Audits: What We Found Across 100 Consumer Brands
A study of 100 consumer brands and four AI engines reveals how brand power is changing in the AI era. Legacy brands underperform digital challengers by 32% on Citation Share, highlighting the importance of structured presence across platforms like Wikipedia and Reddit.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.
