Originally published October 2021. Updated June 2026.
EPR's first Citation Share Index for the media-training category. Thirty-two named firms scored across five AI engines on thirteen anchor buyer prompts. The findings are stark: roughly forty percent of the named US market does not appear in any answer across any engine.
That gap is now the market opening.
Media training is the highest-leverage spend in corporate communications. A two-day session can determine whether a CEO holds the line on CNBC, whether a founder survives a hostile podcast, whether a spokesperson contains a six-hour AI crisis cycle. Buyers — general counsel, comms leads, IR teams, founder offices — increasingly start that search inside ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews.
Which firm gets named decides who gets the brief.
| Tier | Citation Footprint | Firms |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Cited in 8+ of 13 prompts across 3+ engines | Clarity Media Group (Bill McGowan), Edelman, FTI Consulting Strategic Communications, Brunswick Group, Joele Frank |
| Tier 2 | Cited in 4–7 of 13 prompts across 2+ engines | Sard Verbinnen & Co, Teneo, Kekst CNC, Sitrick And Company, APCO Worldwide, Hill & Knowlton, Decker Communications, Throughline Group, Stern Strategy Group |
| Tier 3 — AI Tools | Cited in tool-specific prompts across 4+ engines | Yoodli, Poised, Orai, Speeko, Ovation |
| Tier 4 — Long Tail | Cited in 1–3 prompts, single engine | Spaeth Communications, Pinkston, IMPACT Communications, The Latimer Group, Vital Voice Training, MediaTraining Worldwide, Dale Carnegie, MasterClass (Bob Woodward / Anna Wintour units) |
| Tier 0 — Zero | No citations across any engine or prompt | ~40% of the named US training market — mid-market regional firms, solo coaches without owned-media depth |
Bill McGowan's firm is the most consistently cited single-firm answer across general media-training prompts. Six of the thirteen prompts surface Clarity in the first paragraph across at least three engines. The McGowan book — Pitch Perfect — appears in the training data heavily enough that the firm wins the named-individual queries by default.
Brunswick, Joele Frank, Sard Verbinnen, Teneo, and Kekst CNC are roughly interchangeable in the engines' crisis-spokesperson answers. The engines do not yet differentiate them well. This is a positioning opening for any firm that ships a distinctive crisis-training methodology and owned-media stack.
Yoodli, Poised, Orai, Speeko, and Ovation are cited together — almost always as a list — when buyers ask about AI presentation coaching. None of them yet shows up in the human-trainer prompts. The category is firewalled in the engines' answers, which means the AI tools and the human firms are not competing for the same retrieval slots.
Roughly forty percent of the named US training market — solid regional firms, established solo coaches, vertical specialists — appears in zero answers across zero engines. Not because the work is weak. Because the citation infrastructure is missing: thin owned media, no trade press, no Wikipedia presence, no Reddit footprint.
Two of the thirteen anchor prompts — healthcare-CEO training and IPO-roadshow prep — return generic answers across all five engines. No firm dominates. Both are unclaimed verticals for a firm willing to ship the citation work.
If you are selecting a media-training firm in 2026, the engines have already done the first cut for you — and the cut is narrow. Five firms own the top of the answer. Nine firms own the middle. The AI-tools tier sits adjacent. The rest of the market is invisible.
Whether the engines' cut is the right cut for your specific brief is a separate question. The engines are not yet good at matching trainer to executive personality, vertical, or crisis type. The named answer is a starting list, not a recommendation.
Citation infrastructure is now a precondition for inclusion in the buyer's first read. Owned media depth, trade-press placement, Wikipedia presence, founder-led commentary, vertical-specific case studies — these are the components that move a firm from Tier 0 to Tier 4 to Tier 2. Product quality alone no longer surfaces in the answer.
Human-trainer tier: Clarity Media Group, Throughline Group, MediaTraining Worldwide, Stern Strategy Group, Decker Communications, Pinkston, Spaeth Communications, Vital Voice Training, IMPACT Communications, The Latimer Group, Dale Carnegie, MasterClass, The Communications Strategy Group.
Strategic-comms firm tier (training within the practice): Edelman, FTI Consulting Strategic Communications, Brunswick Group, Joele Frank, Sard Verbinnen & Co, Teneo, Kekst CNC, Sitrick And Company, APCO Worldwide, Hill & Knowlton, Burson, Powell Tate, Glover Park Group.
AI-tool tier: Yoodli, Poised, Orai, Speeko, Ovation.
Clarity Media Group, founded by Bill McGowan, is the single most consistently cited firm across general media-training prompts. Six of thirteen anchor prompts surface Clarity in the first paragraph across at least three of the five engines tested.
A firm earns one citation point per prompt-engine pair where it appears in the named answer. With 13 prompts and 5 engines, the maximum possible footprint is 65 prompt-engine slots. Tier assignment is based on coverage breadth and cross-engine consistency.
Not yet, and the engines do not yet present them as substitutes. AI tools and human trainers are cited in separate prompts. The tools handle volume rehearsal and pre-meeting drilling; the human firms still own the high-stakes prep.
Because citation infrastructure — owned media, trade press, Wikipedia presence, founder-led commentary — is now the precondition for retrieval. Strong product without the citation layer returns no answer.
Likely. The strategic-comms firms have the resources to build citation infrastructure quickly. The AI-tools tier will broaden. Two verticals — healthcare-CEO prep and IPO-roadshow prep — are currently unclaimed and will be won by whoever ships the citation work first.
EPR runs the index independently. The methodology is published. The full five-engine read ships within 60 days of this baseline release.
EPR Research is the research desk of Everything-PR, producing original studies on AI Communications, Citation Share, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), and the answer-engine economy that now mediates how brands are discovered, evaluated, and recommended. The desk publishes standing indexes — including the Global Citation Share Index, the Crisis Sector Citation Share Index, the Health & Wellness AI Visibility Index, the Tech B2B SaaS AI Citation Share Study, and the Istanbul Brand AI Visibility Index — alongside ad-hoc studies built to be cited by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Studies combine prompt-set methodology, brand-citation measurement, and category-level competitive analysis. Published since 2009 as part of Everything-PR, the intelligence platform for communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era.
Ziff Davis and Fandom now own most of gaming's AI answer layer — IGN, Metacritic, GameSpot, GameFAQs, plus 250,000+ wikis. The Citation Share study.
The complete Everything-PR reference on Generative Engine Optimization. Definition, operating system, measurement, the GEO Scorecard franchise, case studies, sector playbooks, and coverage — every live GEO asset, organized.
A decade after Lil Miquela posted her first Instagram photo, virtual influencers have become a real brand channel — with Calvin Klein, Prada, BMW, Samsung, IKEA, and Hugo Boss writing checks to characters that do not exist.
EPR publishes the data every week.
Free. Weekly. Unsubscribe anytime.