EPR Editorial Team2 min read
The first AI platform paying publishers for citations is reshaping where brands need to land coverage.
In August 2025, Perplexity allocated $42.5 million to a publisher revenue-sharing program tied to its Comet browser and Comet Plus subscription, with publishers receiving 80% of subscription revenue and Perplexity keeping 20%. It's the first AI platform to pay publishers based on usage rather than upfront licensing.
The Publisher Roster
Perplexity's program launched with TIME, Der Spiegel, Fortune, Entrepreneur, The Texas Tribune, and WordPress.com. Subsequent expansions added ADWEEK, Blavity, DPReview, Gear Patrol, The Independent, Lee Enterprises, the Los Angeles Times, and others. The footprint now spans more than 25 countries.
The notable absences. News Corp (parent of the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, Barron's, and Dow Jones) is not a Perplexity partner — instead, Dow Jones and the New York Post sued Perplexity in October 2024 alleging "content kleptocracy." The New York Times is also not a Perplexity partner; the Times sent Perplexity a cease-and-desist letter the same month. Inside Perplexity, the largest U.S. paywalled publishers are adversaries, not partners. The full strategic context: The Times Bet Against the Answer Engine · Paywalls vs. AI.
Why This Matters for PR
Until now, AI platforms benefited from publisher content without paying for it. The Perplexity model creates a direct revenue tie-in: cited content earns money. Publishers in the program have a clear incentive to publish content models will cite — original reporting, named experts, structured information.
Perplexity provides participating publishers with analytics dashboards showing which articles are cited, in what contexts, and with what revenue impact. When a publication's editor knows which content earns AI citations, the pitches that win are the ones that fit that pattern.
OpenAI has signed licensing deals with major publishers. Google has its own publisher arrangements. Anthropic has signed deals with Reddit and other platforms. The web is fragmenting into AI-licensed content tiers.
What to Do This Quarter
Map your earned media coverage against Perplexity's publisher list. Pitch original data, ranked lists, and named-expert commentary. Track AI citation share in Perplexity specifically. Reassess your trade-publication mix. Recognize that the publisher set inside Perplexity differs sharply from the set inside ChatGPT — News Corp wins ChatGPT and loses Perplexity, the Times loses both, the Perplexity partners (Time, Fortune, LA Times, the Independent, Texas Tribune) win Perplexity and may sit further down the ChatGPT stack.
The Bigger Pattern
Perplexity's program is one signal of a larger structural change: AI platforms are starting to pay for the content they cite. The publishers refusing to participate — most prominently The New York Times — are betting that the legal precedent they're pursuing will be worth more than the revenue share they're forgoing. The full analysis: The Times Bet Against the Answer Engine.
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.
FinTech startups that fail to define their category early get defined by the market — usually wrong. Kevin Mercuri, CEO of Propheta Communications, on why early-stage PR is foundational infrastructure, not a late-stage growth tactic.
The dynamic of litigation reputation has shifted. Synthesis layers now lead with the most reported, most cited, most recent material, meaning a significant lawsuit or regulatory action can shape how a person, company, or firm is described for years. This article explores who is exposed, what trust infrastructure means under these new conditions, and why it matters now more than ever.
In 2020, AI engines answering longevity queries relied on traditional medical sources. By 2026, the answer layer has been rebuilt, with podcasts, clinics, and individual protocols becoming dominant. This article explores how personalities like Peter Attia, Andrew Huberman, and Bryan Johnson now anchor the longevity AI answer layer, influencing how LLMs cite information in this category. It also examines the implications for brands and the missing "skeptical layer" in AI responses.
EPR publishes the data every week.
Free. Weekly. Unsubscribe anytime.