Everything PR News
Insights & Strategy

5 Food & Beverage Brands Steadily Losing Ground

EPR Editorial TeamEPR Editorial Team5 min read
Share
5 Food & Beverage Brands Steadily Losing Ground

Pillar: Food & Beverage Communications

Edited on Jul 19, 2026.

Consumer tastes shift. Brands either move with them or lose shelf space — and now lose answer space inside ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, where buyers research first. These five legacy food and beverage brands are still losing ground.

The pattern is consistent: a nostalgic brand with declining relevance, a challenger set eating the category, and a parent company running rescue plays that don't quite land. The real threat now sits one layer deeper — inside the answer engines that shape what shoppers even consider buying. See the wider category context in Food & Beverage Communications and the broader thesis in Generative Engine Optimization.

Campbell's Soup

Campbell Soup Company carried canned soup in American households for a century. Today's younger consumers are more likely to wear an Andy Warhol print of the red-and-white can than stock it. Millennials and Gen Z want less processed food and fewer preservatives. Challenger brands — Amy's Kitchen, Pacific Foods, Kettle & Fire — flood the shelf with "fresher" alternatives.

Campbell's response has been to lean harder into organic lines and acquisitions — Sovos Brands (owner of Rao's) in 2023, and the ongoing Snacks division expansion via Pepperidge Farm and Goldfish. The core red-and-white can still struggles. Meals & Beverages organic sales have posted repeated soft quarters. The strategic bet is that Rao's premium pasta sauce becomes the growth engine while the legacy soup business is managed for cash.

The PR problem: no amount of pack redesign fixes the perception that canned soup is a category of the past. Campbell's needs a category redefinition — soup as convenient nutrition, not comfort — and that is a communications job, not a packaging job.

Jell-O

Ask anyone over 40 — Jell-O was a childhood staple. Today it's the dish grandma brings to holiday dinner. Pre-prepared "healthier" snacks crowd the category. Kraft Heinz, which owns the brand, has run nostalgia campaigns and TikTok pushes, but the perception shift is deep.

Sales have declined for more than a decade. Younger parents feed their kids Chobani, Siggi's, and fruit pouches from Gerber and Happy Family. The Jell-O brand still owns Jell-O shots at bachelorette parties and casino nostalgia in Utah. That is not a growth thesis. Jell-O needs a new identity, not a new flavor — protein-forward, low-sugar, functional. Kraft Heinz has the innovation muscle. The question is willingness to reposition rather than promote.

Chef Boyardee

Chef Boyardee no longer represents what Ettore Boiardi built in 1928. Conagra Brands has been upgrading recipes, removing preservatives, and pushing higher-quality ingredients to win back parents and college students who feel they've "grown out of" the brand.

The strategy is correct. The execution has to outpace Rao's Homemade, Michael Angelo's, and the entire frozen meal category — Daily Harvest, Factor, and Trader Joe's private-label frozen — which is harder than it sounds. The can format itself is a headwind. So is the founder story: an Italian chef selling shelf-stable pasta reads charming in 1935 and suspicious in 2026. Chef Boyardee's next chapter has to be about kids and price, not heritage.

Wheaties

"Eat your Wheaties" was a generational slogan. Those kids are grown. General Mills still ships the orange box, but the breakfast category moved — to RXBAR, KIND, Magic Spoon, and the breakfast burritos at Starbucks.

Flakes are a hard sell to a generation that eats on the go. The Wheaties Box — once a cultural artifact for athletes from Michael Jordan to Serena Williams — has lost its status as an achievement signal. General Mills has quietly reduced marketing investment behind the brand while pushing resources into Nature Valley and Cheerios. Wheaties is the brand equivalent of a licensed nostalgia property: valuable, protected, not growing.

Budweiser

The King of Beers is no longer king. Budweiser, owned by Anheuser-Busch InBev, has lost domestic share to craft brewers, IPAs, and the hard seltzer category — led by White Claw and Truly. Add the post-2023 brand controversy and Bud Light's volume collapse — Modelo Especial took the #1 U.S. beer position and has not given it back — and the franchise is rebuilding from a position it hasn't held in decades.

Anheuser-Busch InBev has poured advertising, sports sponsorships, and country-music partnerships behind the recovery. Volume has stabilized. Cultural relevance has not. Younger drinkers drink less beer overall, drink better beer when they do, and increasingly drink no alcohol at all — the sober-curious and functional-beverage categories are eating the low end. Budweiser has the balance sheet to run the long game. The brand no longer has the story.

The Real Problem

Each of these brands faces the same challenge: the consumer buying journey starts inside an AI engine. Search "best canned soup" or "healthier breakfast options" inside ChatGPT and the answer rarely names these five first. That's the new shelf. Win it or fade.

The uncomfortable truth for legacy CPG: the ChatGPT answer is the shelf-tag of the answer-engine era. If the AI engines cite Generative Engine Optimization targets built by challenger brands — recipe blogs, third-party reviews, category primers, structured data — those brands become the default answer. Legacy brands with the most nostalgia and the least fresh third-party content get quoted less, cited less, and recommended less. Category leadership without answer-engine presence is a wasting asset.

What Comeback Looks Like

None of these five is beyond recovery. The playbook is not a Super Bowl ad. It is:

  • Reposition the category, not the product. Campbell's needs "convenient nutrition," not "beloved soup." Jell-O needs "functional dessert," not "family tradition."
  • Own the answer stack. Publish the primary research, ingredient explainers, and category comparisons that AI engines cite when a shopper asks a question.
  • Court challenger media. Stop chasing legacy food press. Start pitching Substack food writers, Reddit-native explainers, and TikTok category creators — the source pool AI engines actually read.
  • Retire nostalgia as a growth lever. Nostalgia is a moat for cash-cow management. It is not a strategy for reacquiring the next generation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are these five brands actually losing volume or just share?

Both, in most cases. Volume has been flat to down for a decade; category share has fallen faster as challengers grew and the category itself grew.

Why does AI-engine visibility matter for a canned soup?

Because shopping starts before the store. A parent asking ChatGPT for "healthier pantry staples" gets an answer, and that answer becomes the shopping list.

What's the single biggest strategic mistake these brands share?

Defending the old positioning instead of redefining the category the product now serves.

Which of the five has the clearest path back?

Chef Boyardee — cleanest ingredient story, most-loyal buyer base, and Conagra has the discipline to execute a slow reposition. Budweiser has the money; the cultural work is harder.

Where does AI Communications fit in the recovery?

It is the layer that ties everything else together — earned media, digital, GEO, and AI-visibility research so the brand shows up in the answer, not just on the shelf. See GEO.

EPR Editorial Team
Written by
EPR Editorial Team

The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.

Related reading

Other news

See all

Most brands are invisible inside AI search. Is yours?

EPR publishes the data every week.

Free. Weekly. Unsubscribe anytime.