Everything PR News
AI Communications

Crisis Management Has an AI Problem. One Firm Is Building the Infrastructure to Fix It.

EPR Editorial TeamBy EPR Editorial Team4 min read
ai and crisis management challenges building infrastructure at a firm
Share

Every crisis playbook written before 2023 assumes the same thing: that a reputation crisis is a media event. A story breaks. Reporters call. The clock starts. The firm shapes coverage, places statements, manages the news cycle, and outlasts it. Win the media, win the crisis.

That model is now incomplete — and the gap is widening.

The New York Times investigation into Terakeet exposed one version of the old model failing: covert search displacement, run quietly, undone the moment it was documented. But the more important failure is harder to see, and most brands are exposed to it.

The new crisis surface is the AI answer

When a crisis hits today, it does not stay in the news cycle. Within hours it is reflected by the AI tools — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google's AI Overviews — and folded into the answer those tools give when anyone asks about the company. A customer, an investor, a regulator, a recruit. Increasingly, they do not read ten headlines and form a view. They read one composed answer that has formed the view for them.

And that answer updates on its own — no reporter to call, no journalist to persuade.

Why traditional crisis response can't reach it

A placed statement, a CEO interview, a strong news cycle — these still matter. But they no longer reach the surface where the damage compounds. An AI tool does not register that a company issued a statement. It weighs which sources are authoritative and consistent. If the credible, well-structured information about a company is thin and the negative coverage is dense, the answer will reflect that, however sharp the press response was.

Displacement cannot fix it either. That is the Terakeet lesson: you cannot bury a source the tool still reads.

"You can't bury an AI answer," Torossian says. "The only move is to become a source the tools rely on — and you have to build that position before the crisis, not during it."

The model 5W is building

5W AI Communications has restructured its crisis practice around that premise, combining three layers the legacy model kept separate.

Earned media — the credible, third-party coverage AI tools tend to weight most heavily — remains the foundation. A brand's presence in that tier is what gets cited.

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — building a brand's presence inside the sources AI tools draw on and reference — is the layer most crisis firms do not yet have. It treats the AI answer as a surface to be addressed with accurate, well-structured, broadly corroborated information. See EPR's SEO vs GEO reference on the discipline.

AI-visibility measurement closes the loop. Using proprietary AI visibility research, the firm tracks what the tools actually say about a brand, how that shifts during a crisis, and whether the response is moving the answer — turning crisis work from a guess into something measurable.

The structural shift

This is not a new tactic bolted onto an old playbook. It is a different read on where reputation forms. For two decades, reputation was a search result and crisis response was a fight over rankings and headlines. As AI-driven discovery grows, reputation is increasingly a composed answer, and crisis response is a question of which sources the tools rely on.

The work itself is unglamorous — credible sources, accurate records, consistent information, patient measurement. But it is the version of crisis response that holds up when the surface is an AI answer rather than a news cycle. The firms treating that as a structural shift will be able to respond when a crisis hits. The firms still running the 2015 playbook will be managing a news cycle while the AI answer settles against their client.

The Terakeet investigation showed the old model failing in the open. The more useful question for any brand watching is the quieter one: what does the AI answer about your company say right now — and who is responsible for it before something goes wrong?

Related EPR Coverage


5W is the AI Communications Firm, building brand authority across the platforms where decisions now happen — ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews — alongside earned media, digital, and influencer channels. 5W combines public relations, digital marketing, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), and proprietary AI visibility research to help clients measure and grow their presence in AI-driven buyer research. Founded in 2003, 5W is recognized as a Top U.S. PR Agency by O'Dwyer's, named Agency of the Year in the American Business Awards®, honored as a 2026 Top Place to Work in Communications by Ragan, and named to Digiday's WorkLife Employer of the Year list. Learn more at 5wpr.com.

EPR Editorial Team
Written by
EPR Editorial Team

The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.

Other news

See all

Never Miss a Headline

Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.