There’s nothing particularly new about people standing up for what they believe in, even when there could be terrible consequences. Nelson Mandela spent years in a third-world prison, and Rosa Parks sparked a positive change for countless lives. But 2016/2017 may well go down as the years of “taking a stand.” Some of it was even done while sitting or kneeling. But as should be noted, taking a stand can have consequences – good and bad. The PR of doing so can also have good and bad outcomes.
For 18-year-old Dorsa Derakshani, an Iranian female grandmaster chess champion, her career could come to an end over the recent stand she took in refusing to wear the mandated Hijab head covering at an international meet in her home country. Though she lives outside of Iran, she is part of their national team, and the hijab is not only required, but there are stiff penalties for not wearing it in public while in her country, let alone a competition.
Alternatively, in Hollywood and its many entertainment industries of film, music, stage, etc., taking a conservative stand is risky for the career, when it comes to future work in an industry filled with people and companies that lean heavily liberal. For those who flout the liberal presence, such as Joy Villa at the Grammys wearing the Make America Great/Trump dress, it proved great for her current record sales but may make her unable to do another if no one is willing to work with her.
Beyond that, there’s a lot of protest going on in groups, some of them using violent measures or choosing to continue their protest by leaving a huge mess behind, including the environmentalists leaving so much garbage after their pipeline protests that it could take weeks to clean up after their departure. Those groups declaring one thing and doing another, certainly face negative PR now and in the future.
The question for anyone ready and willing to make a stand on their beliefs – are they prepared for the consequences and do the choices they make support the stand they take? No one wants to look silly afterward; no one wants to be the posterchild for stupid choices. But if you truly believe in something and know that there could be a negative backlash, temporarily or long-term, then choose your battle, and be consistent with your message and actions. There are going to be people who love your for it and people who will curse you for it.
For many, it is safer to keep their beliefs and viewpoint a more private matter. Either approach is acceptable, there’s no law that says you have to die on the sword of public opinion, but there’s not one that says you cannot speak up either – at least not in these United States – not yet anyway.
There’s nothing particularly new about people standing up for what they believe in, even when there could be terrible consequences. Nelson Mandela spent years in a third-world prison, and Rosa Parks sparked a positive change for countless lives. But 2016/2017 may well go down as the years of “taking a stand.” Some of it was even done while sitting or kneeling. But as should be noted, taking a stand can have consequences – good and bad. The PR of doing so can also have good and bad outcomes.
For 18-year-old Dorsa Derakshani, an Iranian female grandmaster chess champion, her career could come to an end over the recent stand she took in refusing to wear the mandated Hijab head covering at an international meet in her home country. Though she lives outside of Iran, she is part of their national team, and the hijab is not only required, but there are stiff penalties for not wearing it in public while in her country, let alone a competition.
Alternatively, in Hollywood and its many entertainment industries of film, music, stage, etc., taking a conservative stand is risky for the career, when it comes to future work in an industry filled with people and companies that lean heavily liberal. For those who flout the liberal presence, such as Joy Villa at the Grammys wearing the Make America Great/Trump dress, it proved great for her current record sales but may make her unable to do another if no one is willing to work with her.
Beyond that, there’s a lot of protest going on in groups, some of them using violent measures or choosing to continue their protest by leaving a huge mess behind, including the environmentalists leaving so much garbage after their pipeline protests that it could take weeks to clean up after their departure. Those groups declaring one thing and doing another, certainly face negative PR now and in the future.
The question for anyone ready and willing to make a stand on their beliefs – are they prepared for the consequences and do the choices they make support the stand they take? No one wants to look silly afterward; no one wants to be the posterchild for stupid choices. But if you truly believe in something and know that there could be a negative backlash, temporarily or long-term, then choose your battle, and be consistent with your message and actions. There are going to be people who love your for it and people who will curse you for it.
For many, it is safer to keep their beliefs and viewpoint a more private matter. Either approach is acceptable, there’s no law that says you have to die on the sword of public opinion, but there’s not one that says you cannot speak up either – at least not in these United States – not yet anyway.
Written by
EPR Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
EPR Editorial Team · 06/02/2026
The 2016 Top 20 Celebrity Influencers Study — A 2026 Retrospective
The 2016 celebrity-influencer ranking — looked at from 2026. What the data got right, what it missed, and the rise of influencer-as-distribution-infrastructure. The 2016 ranking measured the present accurately. It did not capture what was about to happen.
EPR Editorial Team · 06/02/2026
How Beyoncé Mastered the Art of Online Branding: The Controlled-Scarcity Architecture
The surprise drop, Lemonade, Ivy Park, Beychella — and the controlled-scarcity architecture underneath the most-studied digital PR case study in modern pop. The most important sentence in modern celebrity digital PR is the one Beyoncé does not post.
EPR Editorial Team · 06/02/2026
Prince: The Legacy Brand Architecture
The April 2016 death of Prince Rogers Nelson and the legacy-brand case study his estate has built since. This is not a Prince biography. This is a legacy-brand case study. The case study did not end when he died. It restructured.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.