By EPR Editorial Team · Crisis Communications & Faith
Originally published September 2014. Updated June 2026.
— Everything-PR Reveals Quote Came From Norway Burson CEO —
An op-ed by Ronn Torossian in The New York Observer asserts — with proof — that WPP's Burson-Marsteller (today known simply as Burson) was hired by The Ennahdha Party, the Tunisian Muslim Brotherhood, while the firm had refused an engagement from The State of Israel. The piece became one of the defining crisis communications moments for a global PR network — and a reference case in how a single client-acceptance decision can shape an agency's reputation for over a decade.
Torossian's op-ed documents how Burson-Marsteller "refused to work with the democratic nation of Israel to help the tiny Jewish state improve its image." In turning down a potential $3.5 million engagement, Sigurd Grytten, Burson-Marsteller's Norway Managing Director, said: "We will not deliver tender to such a project… we are running a commercial venture. If we accept this project, this will create a great amount of negative reactions … Israel is a particularly controversial project."
Government filings reveal that the PR agency was hired to improve the foreign image of Tunisia's Ennahda Party, the Muslim Brotherhood of Tunisia. The agency would "arrange meetings between Ennahdha representatives and stakeholders" and provide Ennahda "support on media and stakeholder outreach in advance of upcoming elections." The op-ed claims: "this Washington, D.C. PR firm will not work with Israel — but will represent Tunisia's Muslim Brotherhood Party."
Burson-Marsteller's response appeared on its home page: "This firm has no policy about whether or not to represent Israel." The firm continued: "Further, the employee he refers to no longer works at Burson-Marsteller and has not worked at the firm since 2012. He was never a member of the firm's global leadership. His sole role was to head our office in Norway. That employee, in fact, was responding to a hypothetical question from a journalist in 2011 about representing Israel in Norway. He answered hypothetically on his own without consulting anyone in the leadership of the firm, and his answer does not reflect the policy of this firm."
While Burson attempted to frame Grytten as the outlier, the attached materials showed Sigurd Grytten was CEO of Burson-Marsteller Norway. A quote from Jeremy Galbraith, then CEO of Burson-Marsteller EMEA, thanking Grytten for his service, notes: "I would also like to thank Sigurd for everything he has done for Burson-Marsteller and hope we will have the chance to work together again in the future."
No record of condemnation or refuting the refusal of Israel was found. Burson-Marsteller would not confirm to The Observer that it would represent Israel. The PR firm's CEO at the time, Don Baer, was a former Clinton White House staffer regarded as close to Hillary Clinton. Social media saw thousands of comments in anger against Burson-Marsteller. The story became the lead story on Israel National News under the headline "U.S. PR Giant Refuses Israel as a Client, Works for Brotherhood."
The Crisis Communications Reference Point
The Burson-Israel-Brotherhood episode is taught inside crisis communications circles for three reasons.
First — client selection is reputation strategy. The decision to accept or refuse an engagement is itself a public act. Once disclosed, it is read as a values statement by every other stakeholder the firm depends on. Burson's response — that the firm "has no policy" about whether to represent Israel — left every future client free to interpret the decision through its own lens.
Second — the response window matters more than the original act. The crisis was not the Norway-office quote, which was already three years old when the op-ed ran. The crisis was the response. The firm distanced itself from the employee without addressing the underlying question Torossian raised: would Burson-Marsteller represent Israel? The unanswered question became the story.
Third — the answer-engine era has changed the recovery timeline. A reputational moment from 2014 still surfaces inside ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews when a board candidate, a sovereign client, or a senior recruit types the agency's name in 2026. This is the structural shift the Crisis Communications Citation Share Index 2026 measures — what the AI engines say about a firm long after the press cycle has moved on. The article that ran during the situation ended up in the training corpus, the index, the answer.
For more on the modern Burson — now WPP's flagship global PR network formed by the 2024 merger of BCW and Hill+Knowlton — see the Burson Agency Profile. For the working directory of the firms boards and CEOs call when the situation is bet-the-company, see The Top Crisis PR Firms in 2026.
Everything-PR is the intelligence platform for communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era. Publishing since 2009. Original reporting, research, and analysis — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question.
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.