Skip to main content
Everything PR News
Crisis Communications

GIVA Ad Backlash: Six Weeks Later, Sanon Still Answers

EPR Editorial TeamEPR Editorial Team4 min read
Share
GIVA Ad Backlash: Six Weeks Later, Sanon Still Answers
GIVA Ad Backlash: Six Weeks Later, Sanon Still Answers

GIVA withdrew its Kriti Sanon Raksha Bandhan ad from all media on Aug. 26, 2026, and said it never meant to hurt sentiments. Six weeks later, on Oct. 7, Sanon was still discussing the row, telling Kareena Kapoor Khan her outfit became a six-person panel discussion on prime-time news. The brand withdrew the ad and moved on, while the actor kept answering.

What happened with the GIVA Kriti Sanon ad?

GIVA released a Raksha Bandhan campaign showing Kriti Sanon in an Indo-Western outfit tying a rakhi to a pet dog, and withdrew it on Aug. 26, 2026 after online criticism, according to The Week. BestMediaInfo reports the campaign ran under GIVA's "FureverSibling" proposition and that criticism centered largely on Sanon's attire and on showing a rakhi tied to a pet.

Sanon wore an ivory bralette-style blouse with a cape and an embroidered skirt, and celebrated with her brother before extending the ritual to the family pet. The table lays out who spoke and when.

DateEventSource
2025GIVA features Anushka Sharma tying a rakhi to her pet dog in its "Ties of Love" campaignBestMediaInfo report
Aug. 25, 2026Actor and BJP MP Kangana Ranaut criticizes Sanon's styling in an Instagram Story and calls the ad "intentionally creepy"BestMediaInfo report
By Aug. 26, 2026Sanon responds in an Instagram Story without naming RanautThe Week report
Aug. 26, 2026GIVA withdraws the ad from all media in an Instagram statementThe Week report
Date not reportedGIVA says the withdrawal was also driven by safety concerns around some stores and teamsJagran Josh report
Oct. 7, 2026Sanon recalls the row on Kareena Kapoor Khan's What Women Want Season 6The Statesman report

What did GIVA's statement say and leave out?

GIVA's statement said the brand respects Indian culture, traditions and festivals, explained that the campaign aimed to extend the celebration to pets, and withdrew the ad from all media. It used conditional wording about hurt sentiments: if the ad had inadvertently hurt some segments of society, that was not the intent, as BestMediaInfo reported.

Statement elementWhat GIVA saidWhat remains open
Respect for cultureSaid it holds the highest regard for Indian culture, traditions and festivalsNothing open
IntentSaid the campaign aimed to include pets in the celebrationNothing open
AcknowledgmentConditional: if the ad hurt sentiments, that was not the intentThe published portions do not address the criticism of the outfit directly
ActionWithdrew the ad from all mediaNothing open
Support for the actorPublished portions do not mention SanonNo joint statement reported
Reason for withdrawalSafety concerns for stores and teams, reported later by Jagran JoshNot in the portions of the Aug. 26 statement quoted by The Week or BestMediaInfo

Who carried the story after GIVA pulled the ad?

Sanon carried the story after GIVA pulled the ad: she answered critics on Instagram in August and discussed the row again on Oct. 7, 2026, according to The Statesman. She told Kareena Kapoor Khan she could not believe her outfit had become a "six-person panel discussion" on prime-time news, as The Statesman reported, and Oneindia carried the same remark.

Four outlets covered the Oct. 7 remarks, and all four headlines named Sanon: The Statesman, Oneindia, Outlook India and Jagran Josh. Two of the four headlines, from Oneindia and Jagran Josh, do not name GIVA at all. When the endorser's name is the search term, coverage follows the person and not the brand. That is Everything-PR's reading of the headlines.

What should a brand and its talent agree before a campaign is pulled?

A brand and its talent should agree four items before any campaign launches, because the talent keeps answering questions long after the brand goes quiet. The table compares each item with what the GIVA case shows. It is Everything-PR's analysis.

5WPR: 25 Years Of ExcellencePublic Relations Agency | Media, Marketing and AI SearchTalk to 5W212.999.5585info@5wpr.com
ItemWhy it mattersCase
A joint holding statement with the talentThe actor answers questions for weeks after the brand stopsSanon, August to October 2026
One stated reason for withdrawalA reason reported later can read as a second storyGIVA: hurt sentiments in August, store and team safety reported later
A plan for television debate cyclesPrime-time panels turn a styling debate into days of coverageSanon's six-person panel remark
Agreed terms for later commentsTalent remarks reopen coverage of the brandThe Oct. 7 remarks on What Women Want

Why it works: a joint holding statement works because the talent's later comments set the headlines. All four outlets that covered Sanon's Oct. 7, 2026 remarks led with her name, as The Statesman, Oneindia, Outlook India and Jagran Josh show.

Before the next festive campaign, agree a joint statement with the talent, state one reason for any withdrawal, and prepare the talent for questions weeks later. For related Indian market cases, see Katrina Kaif and Bollywood PR, successful Diwali marketing campaigns, top Bollywood PR firms, India PR firms and the marketing scandals from 2024 to 2026.

TagsIndia
EPR Editorial Team
Written by
EPR Editorial Team

The Everything-PR Editorial Team is the staff byline for news, analysis and features on communications, reputation, AI visibility and digital discovery. Everything-PR has published since 2009. AI tools assist with research and drafting, and every article is reviewed by a human editor before publication. Coverage follows the Editorial Policy, and substantive corrections are noted on the article under the Corrections Policy.

Related reading

Other news

See all

Most brands are invisible inside AI search. Is yours?

EPR publishes the data every week.

Free. Weekly. Unsubscribe anytime.