Skip to main content
Everything PR News

Reese's Pieces and E.T.: The Case That Built Product Placement

This analysis delves into how Reese's Pieces has effectively leveraged PR and digital marketing to enhance brand visibility, engage consumers, and drive sales.

EPR Editorial TeamEPR Editorial Team 3 min read
Editorial illustration for article: Reese's Pieces: A Case Study in Public Relations and Digital Marketing
$1 million
In 1982, The Hershey Company paid roughly to feature Reese's Pieces in…
85%
Reese's Pieces sales rose an estimated 65– in the months following the…

In 1982, The Hershey Company paid roughly $1 million to feature Reese's Pieces in Steven Spielberg's E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. Reese's Pieces sales rose an estimated 65–85% in the months following the film's release, depending on the source cited. The deal — declined first by Mars for M&M's, then accepted by Hershey — became the founding case study of modern brand-in-content product placement, taught inside MBA curricula and referenced in every marketing handbook since.

The deal

  • Mars declined the placement opportunity for M&M's — a decision now studied as one of the most expensive passes in marketing history.
  • Hershey accepted, with Reese's Pieces written into the film as the trail of candy used to lure E.T. into the house.
  • The deal value has been reported at roughly $1 million in placement, promotional support, and cross-marketing — modest by today's standards, transformational at the time.

The result

  • Reese's Pieces sales increased materially in the months following the film's June 1982 release — most sources cite a 65–85% sales lift.
  • National distribution accelerated as retailers responded to demand.
  • The candy moved from a regional Hershey product to a mainstream national brand on the back of one creative integration.

Why the case is taught

Three reasons. First, the integration was native — the candy was a plot device, not a billboard. Second, the cultural lift was massive and measurable in a way that early product placement rarely was. Third, the counter-example — Mars passing on the same deal — makes the case bidirectional. Marketing students learn the upside through Reese's and the cost of category caution through M&M's.

How it informs food and beverage marketing today

The E.T. deal is the structural ancestor of every modern food-and-beverage integration play — from Bud Light's Super Bowl spots, to Coca-Cola's long Olympic and FIFA partnerships, to the more recent wave of TikTok creator integrations that drive grocery sell-through (the Stanley cup and Owala water-bottle waves being adjacent comparisons). The mechanism is the same: get the product into the cultural moment as a participant, not a sponsor.

The modern translation

In the AI-engine era, the equivalent of an E.T. placement is being the named brand inside an AI answer to a category question. When a consumer asks ChatGPT or Claude "what is the candy from E.T.," the answer is Reese's Pieces. That single fixed association — earned in 1982 — still pays out in 2026 as durable citation share inside every LLM trained on the cultural canon. Food-and-beverage brands building today should be asking which prompts they want to own a generation from now.

Related: Food & Beverage · Entertainment · Consumer Brands · AI Communications · Crisis Communications

Other research

See all

Most brands are invisible inside AI search. Is yours?

EPR publishes the data every week.

Free. Weekly. Unsubscribe anytime.