Edited on Oct 20, 2026
Selkirk and JOOLA are the pickleball brands AI engines cite most, according to 5W's 2026 Pickleball AI Visibility Index. Selkirk holds an estimated 10.0% of citations and JOOLA 9.5%, a combined 19.5% across 65+ player prompts run through ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. The Picklr leads facility chains, and USA Pickleball is the authority AI relies on for paddle legality.
In short, for a sport with about 36 million U.S. players and almost no legacy brand memory, the AI answer is often the first thing a new player reads before buying a paddle, joining a facility or choosing a rating system.
- Paddles: Selkirk, JOOLA, Paddletek, Engage and Onix hold ranks 1 to 5.
- Governing body: USA Pickleball ranks 6th, with the approved paddle list as its most-cited page.
- Facilities: The Picklr ranks 8th overall and leads facility chains.
- Ratings: DUPR ranks 14th, with "DUPR vs UTR" among the fastest-growing query types.
In this study
What did the 5W pickleball index measure?
The 5W Pickleball AI Visibility Index measured how often 25 brands appear in AI answers to more than 65 real player prompts in Q1 2026. 5W, a PR, creative and GEO agency, ran prompts such as "best pickleball paddle for beginners," "Selkirk vs JOOLA," "is The Picklr worth the membership" and "DUPR vs UTR" through four AI engines.
The brands span five groups: paddles, facility chains, apparel and footwear, tours and governing bodies, and retail, tech and ratings. 5W also tracked the sources behind the answers, including USA Pickleball, The Dink, Pickleball Magazine, Wirecutter, Front Office Sports and Reddit's r/Pickleball.
5W describes the percentages as estimates based on how often a brand is mentioned across tracked prompts. They are best read as relative visibility, not market share, and the index does not rank paddles on performance or certification.
Which pickleball brands does AI cite most often?
Selkirk ranks first with an estimated 10.0% of citations, followed by JOOLA at 9.5% and Paddletek at 6.0%. The table shows the top 15 brands from the 5W index.
| Rank | Brand | Category | Estimated citation share |
| 1 | Selkirk | Paddles | 10.0% |
| 2 | JOOLA | Paddles | 9.5% |
| 3 | Paddletek | Paddles | 6.0% |
| 4 | Engage | Paddles | 5.5% |
| 5 | Onix | Paddles | 5.0% |
| 6 | USA Pickleball | Governing body | 4.5% |
| 7 | PPA Tour | Pro tour | 4.0% |
| 8 | The Picklr | Facilities | 4.0% |
| 9 | Major League Pickleball | Pro tour | 3.5% |
| 10 | Gearbox | Paddles | 3.0% |
| 11 | Pickleball Central | Retail | 3.0% |
| 12 | Chicken N Pickle | Facilities | 2.5% |
| 13 | CRBN | Paddles | 2.5% |
| 14 | DUPR | Ratings | 2.5% |
| 15 | Franklin | Paddles | 2.0% |
Ranks 16 to 25 are Babolat, Head, Nike Pickleball, Pickleball Kingdom, Gamma, Life Time Pickleball, Ace Pickleball Club, ProKennex, Stack Athletics and Pickleheads.
Why do Selkirk and JOOLA lead paddle citations?
Selkirk and JOOLA lead because each has built a different kind of citation asset. Selkirk offers a paddle for every skill level, with coverage in the major review outlets and more than a decade of earned media. JOOLA's lead comes from endorsement: 5W reports that Ben Johns' signature on the Perseus line is the most-cited paddle detail in competitive-player queries.
Smaller paddle brands win by owning one topic. 5W finds that Engage owns "best control paddle" answers, Gearbox owns elongated shapes, CRBN owns thermoformed construction, and ProKennex owns "pickleball for tennis elbow."
The practical lesson from the index is that a paddle brand gets cited faster by winning one specific question deeply than by competing on every question at once.
How is The Picklr winning facility citations?
The Picklr leads facility citations because it connects several things AI engines look for in one brand. 5W reports 80+ open locations by the end of 2025 and 400+ signed franchise licenses, plus ownership of Stack Athletics apparel, a PPA Tour partnership and a stake in an MLP team.
5W estimates The Picklr appears in close to 40% of facility-category answers, which is well ahead of its share of physical locations. Chicken N Pickle holds a separate niche, appearing in "pickleball restaurant" and "pickleball date night" answers.
Independent facilities are the other side of the same finding. Roughly 10,000 courts have been built across North America since 2020, according to 5W, and almost none of the independents appear in AI answers for "indoor pickleball near me."
Which pickleball brands are losing ground in AI answers?
The brands losing ground are mostly established names from other racquet sports and mass retail. Babolat, Head and Wilson reach crossover players, but AI answers to "best pickleball paddle" favor pickleball-native brands, because the reviews and community posts behind those answers are written by pickleball specialists.
Franklin and Onix have wide retail distribution, yet 5W finds their paddle citations trail brands with smaller footprints such as Paddletek and Engage. The APP Tour sits outside the United Pickleball Association (UPA) formed by the 2024 merger of the PPA Tour and Major League Pickleball, and 5W notes AI answers now describe it as a secondary or legacy tour.
What should pickleball marketers do next?
The 5W index points to eight practical steps for pickleball brands and facilities.
- Check AI citation share monthly, because the category moves faster than a quarterly review catches.
- Publish clear explainers on USA Pickleball and UPA paddle approvals, a high-interest topic few brands cover.
- Pick one sub-category, such as control, elongated shapes or tennis elbow, and cover it in depth first.
- Secure named pro endorsements, which 5W calls the most defensible citation asset a paddle brand can hold.
- Write facility pages that answer "near me" and "worth the membership" questions with real pricing.
- Cover injury prevention and the tennis-to-pickleball transition honestly.
- Connect product content to DUPR levels, since DUPR queries are growing quickly.
- Run a citation check within 72 hours of every major UPA, CBS or sponsor announcement.
The index shows that brand citations in pickleball are already concentrating, while the editorial sources feeding those answers are still young. EPR's own read, which is editorial analysis and not part of the 5W data, is that independent paddle testing and structured pro-tour data are thin, so manufacturer content fills much of the gap on "best paddle" questions.
That leaves room for publishers who add rigorous paddle testing, named expert authors and well-structured tournament and player pages. For brands, 5W's central finding is that pickleball has no decades-old brand memory, so the sources AI engines cite in 2026 are shaping what buyers learn about the sport now.
How the 5W index was built
5W analyzed 65+ pickleball player prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews in Q1 2026, covering 25 brands in five sub-categories. Percentages are 5W estimates of mention frequency across tracked prompts. The index does not rank on-court performance or paddle certification status.
Where does this fit in EPR's coverage?