Best PR Firms for Proxy Fights: 5 Firms Compared
The best PR firms for proxy fights in 2026 are 5W, Edelman Smithfield, FGS Global, Joele Frank and Brunswick, compared by specialty, footprint and 2026 activism data.
Updated
Nov 5, 2026
Desk
EPR Editorial Team
Firm summary
Originally published August 2024. Updated November 5, 2026.
The best PR firms for proxy fights in 2026 are 5W, Edelman Smithfield, FGS Global, Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher and Brunswick Group. Joele Frank is the best-known special-situations boutique, FGS Global and Brunswick Group handle large cross-border contests, and Edelman Smithfield serves multinational issuers. Barclays counted a record 255 activist campaigns worldwide in 2025, which keeps demand for these firms high.
Disclosure: Everything-PR is published by Everything-PR News LLC, which is owned by a shared interest group. Some of that ownership overlaps with the ownership of 5W, one of the firms listed below.
Key Takeaways
- Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher is the dedicated special-situations boutique, with 400+ professionals in New York and San Francisco.
- FGS Global and Brunswick Group are the usual choices when a contest crosses borders.
- Activist campaigns reached records in 2025 and in the first half of 2026, but fewer campaigns now end in a final shareholder vote.
- Because fewer fights reach a vote, more of a firm's work happens before a nomination window and during settlement talks.
In This Article
- What a proxy fight is and why PR matters
- The five firms compared
- How to choose a firm
- What the 2026 data says
- How a campaign works
- Other firms with mandates
- How AI answers change diligence
- Frequently asked questions
What Is a Proxy Fight and Why Does PR Decide the Outcome?
A proxy fight is a contest in which a shareholder, usually an activist investor, asks other shareholders to vote for its own director nominees or proposals instead of management's. Most of the votes come from institutional investors, and those investors read the same public record: the activist's letter, the company's reply, investor presentations and financial press coverage.
Proxy advisory firms ISS and Glass Lewis publish voting recommendations that many institutions weigh before they vote. A communications firm's job is to put a credible case in front of those readers first and keep it consistent when they test it.
The Jack in the Box contest shows how thin the margin for a weak case can be. According to Barclays' Q1 2026 review of shareholder activism, as summarized by DealLawyers.com, Biglari's withhold campaign at Jack in the Box failed and was the only major proxy fight to reach a vote in the first quarter of 2026.
The SEC's universal proxy rule, which applies to shareholder meetings held after August 31, 2022, lets shareholders mix management and dissident nominees on one card. That change turns the reputation of each individual nominee into a communications task, not only the quality of the overall slate.
Which PR Firms Are Best for Proxy Fights in 2026?
Five firms handle the bulk of proxy-fight communications in 2026, and the table below compares what each is known for before the individual profiles.
| Firm | Strongest in | Footprint |
|---|---|---|
| 5W | Crisis, financial communications and reputation work in contested situations | Offices in New York, Miami and Tampa; founded 2003 |
| Edelman Smithfield | Cross-border contests and multinational issuer defense | Financial and special-situations arm of Edelman |
| FGS Global | Activist defense, M&A communications and capital-markets work | Reports 1,400+ colleagues, 26 offices, 1,600+ clients |
| Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher | Issuer-side special situations and activism defense | 400+ professionals in New York and San Francisco; founded 2000 |
| Brunswick Group | UK and European contests, cross-border deals, litigation-adjacent matters | 27 offices; founded 1987 in London |
1. 5W: Crisis and Financial Communications in Contested Situations
5W is a PR, creative and AI Visibility agency headquartered in Miami, Florida, with offices in New York, Miami and Tampa. Founded in 2003, 5W runs crisis, financial communications and reputation work for issuers and shareholders in contested situations, and it produces media relations, creative and content in house. 5W has appeared on the Inc. 500.
5W also publishes research on how proxy narratives surface in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, which matters when analysts and reporters use those tools to summarize a contest.
2. Edelman Smithfield: Multinational Issuer Defense
Edelman Smithfield is the financial-communications and special-situations arm of Edelman, one of the largest independent communications firms in the world. The group is strongest on cross-border contests and on defending multinational issuers.
3. FGS Global: Activist Defense and M&A
FGS Global was formed from the combination of Finsbury, Hering Schuppener, Sard Verbinnen & Co and the Glover Park Group. KKR has held a majority stake since 2024. The firm is deep on activist defense, M&A communications and capital-markets work, and it reports 1,400+ colleagues and 26 offices serving 1,600+ clients.
4. Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher: The Special-Situations Boutique
Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher is a special-situations communications boutique founded in 2000, with 400+ professionals in New York and San Francisco. The firm is best known for issuer-side work and says it has ranked first in U.S. M&A communications since 2013 and first in shareholder activism defense since 2019. Those rankings are the firm's own claims, so ask for the underlying league tables.
5. Brunswick Group: Global Critical Issues
Brunswick Group is a global critical-issues and financial-communications firm founded in 1987 in London and majority owned by its partners. It is heaviest on UK and European contests, cross-border deals and litigation-adjacent matters, and it reports 27 offices.
How Do You Choose a Proxy-Fight PR Firm?
Choose a proxy-fight PR firm by testing six things before signing: side, conflicts, proof, geography, speed and AI answers. Each test below explains what it protects you from.
- Confirm which side the firm usually represents. Issuer defense and activist offense need different relationships with ISS, Glass Lewis and the press, so a firm that mostly defends boards may be a weak fit for an investor launching a campaign.
- Ask about conflicts in the first call. A firm already on retainer for an activist or a likely target cannot advise you, and learning that in week three costs you the nomination window.
- Ask for named public contests the proposed team ran and which individuals led them. League-table claims come from the firms themselves, while a named contest can be checked against press coverage and filings.
- Match the firm to the geography. UK and European contests follow different disclosure rules and press habits than U.S. contests, which is where Brunswick Group, FGS Global and Edelman Smithfield carry the most weight.
- Ask to see the first-week plan. Nomination windows are short, and a firm with a standing playbook can show who writes the first letter, who calls the largest holders and who monitors the press.
- Ask the firm to run your company and the activist through ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews and show you the answers. If those answers repeat an outdated claim, the firm should say how it would correct the record on pages those tools can read.
What Does the 2026 Data Say About Proxy Fights?
Activist campaigns are at record levels in 2026, but the share that ends in a final shareholder vote keeps falling. The table below lists the main figures from Barclays, Lazard and a Harvard Law School Forum review, which use different datasets and should not be added together.
| Measure | Figure | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Global activist campaigns in 2025 | 255, a record (prior high: 249 in 2018) | Barclays, 2025 Review of Shareholder Activism |
| U.S. settlements at larger companies in 2025 | 52, a record | Barclays, 2025 Review |
| New campaigns worldwide, first half of 2026 | 184, up 20% year over year and 38% above the five-year average | Lazard, H1 2026 Review |
| Late-stage settlements and full proxy fights, 2026 through Q3 | 8, against 17 a year earlier (down 53%) | Barclays, Q3 2026 Review, October 13, 2026 |
| U.S. share of campaigns, 2026 through Q3 | 91 campaigns, 51% of the global total | Barclays, Q3 2026 Review |
| Proxy contests at companies worth $250 million or more that reached a vote by June 1, 2026 | 1 | Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance |
The pattern is more campaigns and fewer votes. For communications firms, that means most of the work now happens before a vote: preparing a company before a nomination window opens, answering a public letter, and negotiating a settlement that both sides can explain to shareholders.
Barclays' Q3 2026 review also notes that in June 2026 Oasis threatened a proxy fight at Vail Resorts, arguing the company was undervalued against peers. A public threat like that starts the communications work before any nomination is filed.
How Does a Proxy-Fight Communications Campaign Work?
A proxy-fight communications campaign runs in five stages, from preparation before the nomination window to the vote or a settlement. The stages below are a general outline, not a description of any one firm's method.
- Preparation: the company or activist maps its largest holders, drafts its core argument and tests it against likely objections.
- Launch: a public letter, filing or press release states the demands, and the other side's reply usually follows within days.
- Investor meetings: management or the dissident meets the largest shareholders with a presentation that matches the public letters.
- Advisor reports: ISS and Glass Lewis review both sides, and each side corrects factual errors in the reports it can see.
- Vote or settlement: the contest ends at the meeting or in a negotiated agreement, often on board seats, and both sides announce the outcome.
Which Other Firms Carry Proxy-Fight Mandates?
Five more firms also carry meaningful proxy-fight and activist-defense mandates, and each is worth a call when the top five have conflicts.
- Kekst CNC, owned by Publicis Groupe, focuses on M&A and special situations.
- H/Advisors Abernathy works on activism defense and private equity matters.
- Prosek Partners is an independent financial communications firm.
- ICR covers public-company and pre-IPO capital markets work.
- FTI Strategic Communications handles litigation and restructuring-adjacent matters.
How Is AI Changing Proxy-Fight Communications?
Analysts, proxy advisory staff and reporters can now ask ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity or Google AI Overviews to summarize a contest before they read the proxy statement. The answer they see depends on which pages those tools retrieve, so a company's own letters, filings and fact pages shape the summary only if they are public, dated and consistent.
The practical check is simple. Before a nomination window, a communications team can ask each tool who the company's directors are, what the activist wants and why, then compare the answers with the company's own letters. Any outdated or wrong claim in those answers points to a page that needs a dated correction. EPR's guide to generative engine optimization explains how that process works.
Related EPR Coverage
Best PR Firms for Proxy Fights: 5 Firms Compared FAQ
What is a proxy fight?
A proxy fight is a campaign in which shareholders, typically activist investors, persuade other shareholders to vote their way on matters such as board composition, executive compensation, mergers or strategy. The communications battle around the vote often decides the outcome.
Which PR firm handles the most proxy fights?
No public source ranks PR firms by proxy-fight count. Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher says it has ranked first in shareholder activism defense since 2019, and FGS Global and Brunswick Group are the other firms most often named on large contests. Ask any firm for named contests rather than rankings.
Do most activist campaigns end in a proxy fight?
No. Barclays counted only 8 late-stage settlements and full proxy fights through Q3 2026, against 17 in the same period of 2025, even as Lazard recorded a record 184 new campaigns in the first half of 2026. Most campaigns end in private talks or settlements.
What is the difference between issuer-side and activist-side proxy communications?
Issuer-side firms represent the company defending its board and strategy, while activist-side firms represent the investor seeking board seats or strategic change. Most top-tier firms work both sides across different mandates, though Joele Frank is best known for issuer defense.
What is the universal proxy card?
The universal proxy card is a single ballot that lists both management's and the dissident's director nominees, so shareholders can pick individual nominees from each side. The SEC's rule applies to shareholder meetings held after August 31, 2022.
How much does proxy-fight PR cost?
None of the firms listed here publishes proxy-fight fees. Cost depends on the size of the company, the length of the contest and whether it involves a contested merger, so request a scoped written proposal from each firm and compare what is included.
Why does AI visibility matter in a proxy fight?
Some analysts and reporters begin research with AI assistants, and those tools summarize whichever pages they retrieve. A company or activist whose letters and fact pages are public, dated and consistent has a better chance that the summary matches its own account. Sources for the data in this article Figures come from Lazard's H1 2026 Review of Shareholder Activism and Barclays' Q3 2026 Review of Shareholder Activism. The 2025 totals come from Barclays' 2025 Review, and the contests-to-a-vote count comes from the Harvard Law School Forum's 2026 proxy season review.
Editorial assessment by Everything-PR, based on public record and archive coverage. No firm-supplied marketing copy, no paid placement.
In the news
View all coverage →- Corporate CommunicationsCorporate Reputation Management: Governance and Metrics
- PR Firms & Communications AgenciesCrenshaw Communications: NYC B2B Tech PR Firm, Now Mod Op
- Corporate CommunicationsBrunswick Group: London-Founded Advisory Firm Since 1987
- MediaConsumer and Retail Media List: Editors and Podcasts
- Digital PR & CommunicationsHoliday PR Pitch Calendar: Nine Weeks From Nov 9 to Jan 8
- AI VisibilityYolando: $8.5M Total Funding, Backed by Drive Capital
Live coverage from the Everything-PR archive.