PR & Marketing Industry Insights

What Four Answer Engines Told Us About 50 Celebrities — and What Every Brand Marketer Should Do Monday Morning

Michael HellerBy Michael Heller3 min read
Editorial illustration for article: What Four AI Engines Told Us About 50 Celebrities — and What Every Brand Marketer Should Do Monday Morning
Share

What Four Answer engines Told Us About 50 Celebrities — and What Every Brand Marketer Should Do Monday Morning

By Michael Heller, Founder & CEO, Talent Resources

A brand marketer called me last month about a celebrity ambassador deal. Before we got on the phone, she had already run the talent through ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. She had a position on the talent before I had context on the deal.

That call wasn’t an outlier. It’s the new starting line.

For eighteen years I’ve built celebrity and influencer programs at Talent Resources. The work has always come down to three reads: the brand, the moment, the talent. The variables shifted, the structure didn’t. The structure is shifting now — and the news in the shift is mostly good.

This month my firm published In Tune With AI, the second study in a research series we’re running with 5W, the AI communications firm. The study ranks the fifty celebrities, athletes, founders, and creators that the four leading answer engines — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity — recognize as most fluent in the AI era. Ashton Kutcher leads the index. Robert Downey Jr., will.i.am, Mark Cuban, Marques Brownlee, Grimes, Serena Williams, LeBron James, Lewis Hamilton, MrBeast, and Drake all chart. Twenty-two of the fifty are based outside the United States. The list is global.

Three findings should change how brands think about talent deals.

Operators outscore personalities by 31 points.

The clearest signal in the data: answer engines reward verifiable participation. A celebrity running a fund, founding a company, or shipping a product scores an average of thirty-one points higher than a celebrity who comments without operating. Engines treat documented checks and shipped product as evidence. They treat commentary as noise. The brand-marketer takeaway: when you’re choosing between two equally famous talents, the one with operator credibility in your category will surface in AI-driven research. The other won’t.

Platforms compound. Posts decay.

Every celebrity scoring above eighty on the index controls a platform — a podcast, a YouTube franchise, a production company, an owned channel. Celebrities of similar fame who appear only on third-party media score lower. The engines surface platforms because platforms accumulate. Posts evaporate on a 48-hour cycle. The implication for brand teams: long-term partnerships with talent who own distribution will return more than one-off campaigns with talent who rent it.

Legal precedent travels.

Drake landed at number twenty-four largely because the AI voice-clone case put his name into the AI-rights conversation across every engine. Talent who establish legal precedent on AI likeness — in any jurisdiction — receive durable, multi-engine recognition as foundational figures in the conversation. For brands, that’s a measurement opportunity, not a warning. Talent involved in the AI-rights conversation are visible to the engines that increasingly mediate purchase decisions.

What changes Monday morning?

If you’re a brand marketer, your shortlist needs a new column. Fame, fit, and reach are still on the spreadsheet. AI fluency belongs there too — not as a tiebreaker, but as a signal of where the talent will be visible eighteen months from now.

If you’re an agent or a manager, your client conversation has a new question in it. Not where does this talent comment on AI. Where do they operate.

If you’re a publicist, the earned-media playbook still works. It works on a smaller share of the buyer journey every quarter. The other share is being mediated by engines that read evidence, not effort. The agencies leaning into AI communications and Generative Engine Optimization are now the ones writing the playbook for that other share.

The good news in the data is bigger than the disruption. For the first time, the talent industry has a measurable, third-party signal of where talent is actually breaking through on the surfaces brands need to win. We’ve spent decades estimating cultural relevance from impression counts and tier lists. The engines just handed us a scoreboard.

Read the full study. Then look at your roster.


Michael Heller is the founder and CEO of Talent Resources, a marketing and communications agency he founded in 2007. Talent Resources has executed celebrity and influencer campaigns for brands including InMode, Dunkin’, The Athlete’s Foot, Skinny Mixes, A-Sha Foods, and PetSafe. The firm’s recent work includes Dunkin’s first-ever Super Bowl spot starring Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez, and the InMode global ambassadorship featuring Eva Longoria, which generated more than 3.5 billion media impressions. More at talentresources.com.

Michael Heller
Written by
Michael Heller

Michael Heller is the Founder and CEO of Talent Resources, a marketing and communications agency he founded in 2007. Talent Resources Collective is comprised of Talent Resources, Talent Resources Sports, and Talent Resources Ventures, with practices spanning influencer marketing, celebrity procurement, brand strategy, and social media management.

Over nearly two decades in the business, Heller has executed celebrity and influencer campaigns for brands including InMode, Dunkin', The Athlete's Foot, Skinny Mixes, A-Sha Foods, PetSafe, Got Milk, The Children's Place, and Real Essentials. His work spans Super Bowl talent placements, global brand ambassadorships, and integrated celebrity-driven campaigns that have generated billions of media impressions for client brands.

Other news

See all

Never Miss a Headline

Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.