Public relations professionals often disagree with the decisions taken by the top management of the companies they work for, even if they find it quite difficult and it sometimes costs them their jobs, a new study by researchers at Baylor University and the University of Texas at Austin has shown. The researchers based their findings on 30 in-depth interviews with senior PR professionals who had all held top positions at corporations, nonprofits or government entities.
Although pressured to support the organization they worked for, many PR pros considered themselves an “independent voice” within their employer's establishment, not “mired by its perspectives or politics,” explained Study author Marlene S. Neill, Ph.D., of Baylor University.
While PR pros prefer to be the voice of dissension over a "Yes man" attitude, many of the respondents had to face "kill the messenger" reactions which made it difficult for them to share criticism with their bosses and to persuade top management to agree with a conflicting perspective. In more serious cases, PR pros admitted to having been demoted or fired for refusing to go along with a company decision they considered unethical. Two of the participants stated they had resigned when their advice was rejected, one of the cases involving a requirement to include false information in a press release.
The study also revealed that senior executives saw their PR departments as mere marketing tools, thus limiting the public relations professionals' ability to offer meaningful advise and help solve problems or diffuse crises.
The good news is some participants said they were working for organizations who appreciated a PR team's role of devil's advocate, in some cases having the courage to disagree with a CEO or other top executive helping them build a good relationship within the company.
PR pros agree that in order to be truly useful, a PR team has to work closely with the company's legal counsels and key decision makers to be able to properly control and avert negative situations.PR Insiders — Inside the Public Relations Industry
By EPR Editorial Team1 min read
Report: PR Pros often Disagree with Decisions of the Companies They Work for
By EPR Editorial Team1 min read
Public relations professionals often disagree with the decisions taken by the top management of the companies they work for, even if they find it quite difficult and it sometimes costs them their jobs, a new study by researchers at Baylor University and the University of Texas at Austin has shown. The researchers based their findings on 30 in-depth interviews with senior PR professionals who had all held top positions at corporations, nonprofits or government entities.
Although pressured to support the organization they worked for, many PR pros considered themselves an “independent voice” within their employer's establishment, not “mired by its perspectives or politics,” explained Study author Marlene S. Neill, Ph.D., of Baylor University.
While PR pros prefer to be the voice of dissension over a "Yes man" attitude, many of the respondents had to face "kill the messenger" reactions which made it difficult for them to share criticism with their bosses and to persuade top management to agree with a conflicting perspective. In more serious cases, PR pros admitted to having been demoted or fired for refusing to go along with a company decision they considered unethical. Two of the participants stated they had resigned when their advice was rejected, one of the cases involving a requirement to include false information in a press release.
The study also revealed that senior executives saw their PR departments as mere marketing tools, thus limiting the public relations professionals' ability to offer meaningful advise and help solve problems or diffuse crises.
The good news is some participants said they were working for organizations who appreciated a PR team's role of devil's advocate, in some cases having the courage to disagree with a CEO or other top executive helping them build a good relationship within the company.
PR pros agree that in order to be truly useful, a PR team has to work closely with the company's legal counsels and key decision makers to be able to properly control and avert negative situations.Written by
EPR Editorial Team
EPR Editorial Team - Author at Everything Public Relations
Other news
See all
EPR Editorial Team · 05/15/2026
Anduril and Palantir Out-Cite Lockheed, Northrop, RTX, Boeing, and General Dynamics Combined Inside AI Engines, New Defense Benchmark Finds
A new benchmark reveals Anduril Industries and Palantir Technologies are cited more frequently in AI assistants than the five largest U.S. defense primes combined. The Defense & Aerospace AI Visibility Index 2026, based on 28,400 prompts, shows Anduril and Palantir account for 35.0% of AI Citation Share, while Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX, Boeing Defense, and General Dynamics combined account for 21.1%.
EPR Editorial Team · 05/15/2026
Geo Functions Are Necessary Today
The job description has changed. A communications leader at a Fortune 500 firm now has to answer a question that didn't exist three years ago: when a buyer asks ChatGPT about our category, do we show up — and what does it say about us?This is not a marginal concern. Reuters Insti…
EPR Editorial Team · 05/15/2026
Volume, Virality, and Velocity — How Mass Fashion Wins the PR Game
If luxury fashion sells dreams, mass fashion sells attention.Brands operating at scale do not have the luxury of exclusivity. They must compete in a crowded, fast-moving marketplace where relevance is measured in clicks, shares, and traffic. In this environment, public relations…
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.