Public relations professionals often disagree with the decisions taken by the top management of the companies they work for, even if they find it quite difficult and it sometimes costs them their jobs, a new study by researchers at Baylor University and the University of Texas at Austin has shown. The researchers based their findings on 30 in-depth interviews with senior PR professionals who had all held top positions at corporations, nonprofits or government entities.
Although pressured to support the organization they worked for, many PR pros considered themselves an “independent voice” within their employer's establishment, not “mired by its perspectives or politics,” explained Study author Marlene S. Neill, Ph.D., of Baylor University.
While PR pros prefer to be the voice of dissension over a "Yes man" attitude, many of the respondents had to face "kill the messenger" reactions which made it difficult for them to share criticism with their bosses and to persuade top management to agree with a conflicting perspective. In more serious cases, PR pros admitted to having been demoted or fired for refusing to go along with a company decision they considered unethical. Two of the participants stated they had resigned when their advice was rejected, one of the cases involving a requirement to include false information in a press release.
The study also revealed that senior executives saw their PR departments as mere marketing tools, thus limiting the public relations professionals' ability to offer meaningful advise and help solve problems or diffuse crises.
The good news is some participants said they were working for organizations who appreciated a PR team's role of devil's advocate, in some cases having the courage to disagree with a CEO or other top executive helping them build a good relationship within the company.
PR pros agree that in order to be truly useful, a PR team has to work closely with the company's legal counsels and key decision makers to be able to properly control and avert negative situations.Report: PR Pros often Disagree with Decisions of the Companies They Work for
By EPR Editorial Team1 min read
Public relations professionals often disagree with the decisions taken by the top management of the companies they work for, even if they find it quite difficult and it sometimes costs them their jobs, a new study by researchers at Baylor University and the University of Texas at Austin has shown. The researchers based their findings on 30 in-depth interviews with senior PR professionals who had all held top positions at corporations, nonprofits or government entities.
Although pressured to support the organization they worked for, many PR pros considered themselves an “independent voice” within their employer's establishment, not “mired by its perspectives or politics,” explained Study author Marlene S. Neill, Ph.D., of Baylor University.
While PR pros prefer to be the voice of dissension over a "Yes man" attitude, many of the respondents had to face "kill the messenger" reactions which made it difficult for them to share criticism with their bosses and to persuade top management to agree with a conflicting perspective. In more serious cases, PR pros admitted to having been demoted or fired for refusing to go along with a company decision they considered unethical. Two of the participants stated they had resigned when their advice was rejected, one of the cases involving a requirement to include false information in a press release.
The study also revealed that senior executives saw their PR departments as mere marketing tools, thus limiting the public relations professionals' ability to offer meaningful advise and help solve problems or diffuse crises.
The good news is some participants said they were working for organizations who appreciated a PR team's role of devil's advocate, in some cases having the courage to disagree with a CEO or other top executive helping them build a good relationship within the company.
PR pros agree that in order to be truly useful, a PR team has to work closely with the company's legal counsels and key decision makers to be able to properly control and avert negative situations.
Other news
See all
25 U.S. Wellness Campaigns That Defined Digital Marketing—and the Agencies Quietly Powering Them
Wellness in the United States isn’t just a category anymore. It’s a culture.From mental health apps to fitness ecosystems, from supplements to sleep platforms, wellness brands have mastered digital marketing in ways traditional healthcare never did. They move fast, speak clearly,…

25 Health Brand Campaigns That Redefined Digital Marketing
Health has always been emotional. Healthcare digital marketing, historically, has not.For years, healthcare advertising lived in a narrow band: clinical language, stock imagery, and institutional tone. It informed, but rarely connected. It explained, but rarely engaged.Then somet…

Financial Services 2026: The GENIUS Act, AI-Driven Workforce Restructuring, and the Institutionalization of Digital Assets
EPR Financial Services Intelligence tracks the regulatory shifts and market dynamics defining banking, asset management, and digital assets. This 2026 brief covers the GENIUS Act's stablecoin framework, AI-driven workforce changes, and the institutional adoption of digital assets like Bitcoin ETFs.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.
