Public relations professionals often disagree with the decisions taken by the top management of the companies they work for, even if they find it quite difficult and it sometimes costs them their jobs, a new study by researchers at Baylor University and the University of Texas at Austin has shown. The researchers based their findings on 30 in-depth interviews with senior PR professionals who had all held top positions at corporations, nonprofits or government entities.
Although pressured to support the organization they worked for, many PR pros considered themselves an “independent voice” within their employer's establishment, not “mired by its perspectives or politics,” explained Study author Marlene S. Neill, Ph.D., of Baylor University.
While PR pros prefer to be the voice of dissension over a "Yes man" attitude, many of the respondents had to face "kill the messenger" reactions which made it difficult for them to share criticism with their bosses and to persuade top management to agree with a conflicting perspective. In more serious cases, PR pros admitted to having been demoted or fired for refusing to go along with a company decision they considered unethical. Two of the participants stated they had resigned when their advice was rejected, one of the cases involving a requirement to include false information in a press release.
The study also revealed that senior executives saw their PR departments as mere marketing tools, thus limiting the public relations professionals' ability to offer meaningful advise and help solve problems or diffuse crises.
The good news is some participants said they were working for organizations who appreciated a PR team's role of devil's advocate, in some cases having the courage to disagree with a CEO or other top executive helping them build a good relationship within the company.
PR pros agree that in order to be truly useful, a PR team has to work closely with the company's legal counsels and key decision makers to be able to properly control and avert negative situations.Insights & Strategy
EPR Editorial Team1 min read
Report: PR Pros often Disagree with Decisions of the Companies They Work for
EPR Editorial Team1 min read
Public relations professionals often disagree with the decisions taken by the top management of the companies they work for, even if they find it quite difficult and it sometimes costs them their jobs, a new study by researchers at Baylor University and the University of Texas at Austin has shown. The researchers based their findings on 30 in-depth interviews with senior PR professionals who had all held top positions at corporations, nonprofits or government entities.
Although pressured to support the organization they worked for, many PR pros considered themselves an “independent voice” within their employer's establishment, not “mired by its perspectives or politics,” explained Study author Marlene S. Neill, Ph.D., of Baylor University.
While PR pros prefer to be the voice of dissension over a "Yes man" attitude, many of the respondents had to face "kill the messenger" reactions which made it difficult for them to share criticism with their bosses and to persuade top management to agree with a conflicting perspective. In more serious cases, PR pros admitted to having been demoted or fired for refusing to go along with a company decision they considered unethical. Two of the participants stated they had resigned when their advice was rejected, one of the cases involving a requirement to include false information in a press release.
The study also revealed that senior executives saw their PR departments as mere marketing tools, thus limiting the public relations professionals' ability to offer meaningful advise and help solve problems or diffuse crises.
The good news is some participants said they were working for organizations who appreciated a PR team's role of devil's advocate, in some cases having the courage to disagree with a CEO or other top executive helping them build a good relationship within the company.
PR pros agree that in order to be truly useful, a PR team has to work closely with the company's legal counsels and key decision makers to be able to properly control and avert negative situations.Written by
EPR Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
EPR Editorial Team · 06/25/2026
Toyota: EPR's Coverage of the Japanese Automaker That Still Owns the Reliability Answer Inside AI Engines
Toyota — world's largest automaker by volume. Founded 1937. EPR's canonical Toyota reference: the reliability citation moat, the Saatchi & Saatchi 50-year relationship, and the hybrid-first strategy that's now paying off.
EPR Editorial Team · 06/25/2026
Allbirds: EPR's Coverage of the Merino-Wool DTC Sneaker Brand That IPO'd, Stumbled, and Is Rebuilding
Allbirds — San Francisco, founded 2014 by Tim Brown and Joey Zwillinger. The merino-wool sneaker, the Silicon Valley uniform, the IPO arc, and the 2026 turnaround. EPR's canonical Allbirds reference.
EPR Editorial Team · 06/25/2026
Graza: EPR's Coverage of the DTC Olive Oil Brand That Built a Cult Following on One Story
Graza — DTC olive oil from Jaén, Spain. Founded 2022 by Andrew Benin. EPR's canonical Graza reference: the single-source story, the content-resurfacing playbook, and the founder-led operating model.
Most brands are invisible inside AI search. Is yours?
EPR publishes the data every week.
Free. Weekly. Unsubscribe anytime.