James Hoggan, President of Vancouver PR firm, Hoggan & Associates, as well as Chair of the David Suzuki Foundation, just released a new book called I’m Right, and You’re an Idiot. The book discusses the problems faced by society with all the name calling and unwillingness to listen to someone else’s thoughts or feelings on any given topic.
There’s been a lot of that behavior in politics lately, but it doesn’t end there, it’s in science too – as seen in how issues with climate control have taken more than 20 years to be viewed with any seriousness, and still many call it a “fake.” The problem that happens when “fake” or “loser” or “bigot” or any other negative term is used, it shuts down conversation or discourse on the real issues.
Whether or not climate control (as an example) is fake, shouldn’t be the question. What should be looked at is the data supporting the theory and then it should be discussed with both sides represented. If science is not handled that way, we could still think the world was flat. It’s the open exchange of thoughts and ideas that moves us forward. In time, there comes further information, the approach is adjusted, and everyone moves forward by a few more steps.
It’s the same in politics or social media. Once fingers start pointing and negative titles used, conversation shuts down, feelings get hurt, and everyone walks away a bit disgusted. No good comes from lack of open discussion. And when that lack of discussion happens on a large scale, public trust is lost. When the public sees such behavior, they know nothing is going to happen to improve things, leaving them with a sense of hopelessness.
As Hoggan says in his book, "We need more reporters, we need more journalists, and they need more time to be digging into these issues and [going] beyond the kind of name-calling and the kind of rhetoric on the surface."
Shauna Sylvester, the executive director of the Centre for Dialogue at Simon Fraser University, said "I'm a trained debater. I know how to go for the jugular, I know how to listen, find the gaps in someone's argument, and go for it and try to win the argument. Dialogue … is the exact opposite of that. It's about listening deeply, it's about finding the centre of what people are saying, it's trying to build on people's arguments, and trying to find solutions.”
Clearly, we need more dialog, but getting to that point means those who have been benefiting from their attack-mode behaviors need to start feeling the heat for their actions. Accomplishing that will be the real trick.PR Insights & Public Relations Strategy
By EPR Editorial Team2 min read
Canadian PR Expert Says Public Discourse In “Toxic State”
By EPR Editorial Team2 min read
James Hoggan, President of Vancouver PR firm, Hoggan & Associates, as well as Chair of the David Suzuki Foundation, just released a new book called I’m Right, and You’re an Idiot. The book discusses the problems faced by society with all the name calling and unwillingness to listen to someone else’s thoughts or feelings on any given topic.
There’s been a lot of that behavior in politics lately, but it doesn’t end there, it’s in science too – as seen in how issues with climate control have taken more than 20 years to be viewed with any seriousness, and still many call it a “fake.” The problem that happens when “fake” or “loser” or “bigot” or any other negative term is used, it shuts down conversation or discourse on the real issues.
Whether or not climate control (as an example) is fake, shouldn’t be the question. What should be looked at is the data supporting the theory and then it should be discussed with both sides represented. If science is not handled that way, we could still think the world was flat. It’s the open exchange of thoughts and ideas that moves us forward. In time, there comes further information, the approach is adjusted, and everyone moves forward by a few more steps.
It’s the same in politics or social media. Once fingers start pointing and negative titles used, conversation shuts down, feelings get hurt, and everyone walks away a bit disgusted. No good comes from lack of open discussion. And when that lack of discussion happens on a large scale, public trust is lost. When the public sees such behavior, they know nothing is going to happen to improve things, leaving them with a sense of hopelessness.
As Hoggan says in his book, "We need more reporters, we need more journalists, and they need more time to be digging into these issues and [going] beyond the kind of name-calling and the kind of rhetoric on the surface."
Shauna Sylvester, the executive director of the Centre for Dialogue at Simon Fraser University, said "I'm a trained debater. I know how to go for the jugular, I know how to listen, find the gaps in someone's argument, and go for it and try to win the argument. Dialogue … is the exact opposite of that. It's about listening deeply, it's about finding the centre of what people are saying, it's trying to build on people's arguments, and trying to find solutions.”
Clearly, we need more dialog, but getting to that point means those who have been benefiting from their attack-mode behaviors need to start feeling the heat for their actions. Accomplishing that will be the real trick.Written by
EPR Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
EPR Editorial Team · 05/30/2026
The Wellness Industrial Complex Is a $1.8 Trillion Category
The wellness economy has grown to a $1.8 trillion industry, encompassing physical activity, nutrition, mental wellness, and more. Yet, the media infrastructure that once defined it has shrunk, with discovery and trust shifting from traditional publications to podcasts, Reddit, founder newsletters, TikTok, and AI. This article explores how player and platform changes affect PR.
Ronn Torossian · 05/29/2026
Reddit Is Now the Real Sportsbook Ranking Engine
Reddit has become the dominant signal for AI engines when evaluating sportsbooks. Community sentiment, active resolution of complaints, and transparent customer service on subreddits now determine how AI models rank and recommend gambling operators.
Ronn Torossian · 05/29/2026
The Comparison Page Model Is Breaking
AI is collapsing the sportsbook affiliate funnel. The intermediate layer that built gambling marketing for twenty years is being compressed out of existence. The gambling affiliate economy is built on one structural assumption: customers searching for a sportsbook will land on a comparison page before they land on an operator. That assumption is breaking.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.