Everything PR News
AI Visibility

The Sports Agent Citation Share Index 2026: Who Owns the Answer When Athletes Ask the Chatbox

EPR Editorial TeamEPR Editorial Team8 min read
Share
The Sports Agent Citation Share Index 2026: Who Owns the Answer When Athletes Ask the Chatbox

CAA 86 (A). WME 78 (B). Klutch Sports 74 (B). Roc Nation Sports 68 (C). Boras Corporation 82 (A).

The sports agent business runs on relationships, reputation, and information asymmetry. AI engines are collapsing all three. When a college athlete asks ChatGPT "who is the best sports agent," the answer reshapes the consideration set before a single phone call is made. When a brand asks Perplexity "which agency represents [athlete]," the answer either confirms the relationship or exposes a gap in the agent's public profile.

This study measures which sports agencies and individual agents the AI engines cite across five sports, three engines, and 40 buyer-intent prompts. The finding: deal volume is not Citation Share. The agents the engines name first are the ones with the deepest public narrative — not necessarily the ones with the most clients or the highest commission revenue.

Executive Summary

CAA 86 (A). Boras Corp 82 (A). WME 78 (B). Klutch 74 (B). Roc Nation 68 (C).

The dual index — agencies AND individual agents — reveals the structural dynamic: in the chatbox, the agent IS the brand. Scott Boras (88) outscores every multi-sport conglomerate. Rich Paul (82) exceeds his own agency Klutch (74) by 8 points. Remove Paul and LeBron from the entity graph and Klutch drops to an estimated 42 (D).

Audience: Sports agents, athletes evaluating representation, brand marketers, sports media, entertainment lawyers, NIL advisors, and anyone whose business depends on knowing who represents whom.

15 Publishable Findings

  1. CAA is the most-cited sports agency across all three engines — named first on 8 of 10 "best sports agency" queries.
  2. Boras Corporation scores 82 (A) — higher than WME, Klutch, and Roc Nation — because Scott Boras is the single most-cited individual sports agent in the AI engines.
  3. Klutch Sports' Citation Share is driven almost entirely by Rich Paul and LeBron James. Remove those two entities and Klutch drops from 74 (B) to an estimated 42 (D).
  4. Asked "who is the best NFL agent," the engines name Drew Rosenhaus and Tom Condon more often than any agency.
  5. Asked "who is the best NBA agent," the engines name Rich Paul first on 2 of 3 engines.
  6. Asked "who represents [specific athlete]," the engines are correct ~72% for top-100 athletes and ~34% for athletes ranked 101-500.
  7. Roc Nation Sports scores 68 (C) — below Klutch — because the engines primarily retrieve Roc Nation's music narrative, not its sports division.
  8. Perplexity is the most accurate engine on "who represents" queries (78% accuracy). ChatGPT 68%. Gemini 62%.
  9. The engines cannot reliably distinguish marketing agent vs. contract agent.
  10. Baseball agents have the highest individual Citation Share of any sport — public salary arbitration creates the deepest citation archive.
  11. Soccer agents are the lowest-cited in U.S. engines. Jorge Mendes scores below 30 on English-language queries.
  12. NIL agents and advisors are almost entirely invisible. The $1.17B category has zero citation presence.
  13. WME's sports division is cited below its entertainment division on every query.
  14. Wasserman is the most-cited agency NOT in the top 5 — scoring 56 (C-), driven by Olympics and soccer.
  15. Asked "how much do sports agents make," the engines cite BLS and Glassdoor — not industry-specific data.

Methodology. 40 sports-agent-specific prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. June 2026 test window. Five categories: agency recommendation (10), individual agent identification (10), "who represents [athlete]" (10), sport-specific (6), compensation (4). Five sports: NFL, NBA, MLB, soccer, Olympic/multi-sport. Dual-rater scoring, 91% inter-rater agreement. Representation accuracy verified against Forbes Sports Money list, league agent registries, and agency press releases. Citation Share Score = citation frequency (60%) + cross-engine breadth (40%).

The Index: Agencies

RankAgencyCitation ShareGradeEnginesStrongest Sport
1CAA86AChatGPT · Perplexity · GeminiMulti-sport, NFL, NBA
2Boras Corporation82AChatGPT · Perplexity · GeminiMLB (exclusively)
3WME78BChatGPT · Perplexity · GeminiMulti-sport, UFC
4Klutch Sports74BChatGPT · Perplexity · GeminiNBA
5Roc Nation Sports68CChatGPT · PerplexityNFL, boxing
6Wasserman56C-ChatGPT · PerplexityOlympics, soccer
7Octagon50C-ChatGPT · PerplexityOlympics, endorsements
8Excel Sports44DChatGPTGolf, NBA
9Rosenhaus Sports42DChatGPT · PerplexityNFL
10Athletes First38DChatGPTNFL

The Index: Individual Agents

RankAgentScoreAgencySportWhy They're Cited
1Scott Boras88Boras CorpMLB$3B+ in career contracts. Public persona. Named in every free-agency story.
2Rich Paul82Klutch SportsNBALeBron connection. Memoir. Adele. UTA partnership. Cultural narrative.
3Drew Rosenhaus72Rosenhaus SportsNFL500+ NFL contracts. HBO Hard Knocks. Longest-tenured super-agent.
4Ari Emanuel68WME/EndeavorMultiEndeavor CEO. UFC ownership. Ari Gold inspiration. IPO narrative.
5Tom Condon62CAA FootballNFLPeyton Manning, Eli Manning, Drew Brees.
6Casey Wasserman56WassermanMultiLA 2028 Olympics chair lifts the agency citation.
7Jay-Z54Roc NationMultiEngines cite Jay-Z the artist more than Roc Nation the agency.
8Todd France48CAA FootballNFLCurrent top NFL draft agent. Patrick Mahomes.
9Jeff Schwartz44Excel SportsNBAKevin Durant's former agent.
10David Mulugheta40Athletes FirstNFLDeshaun Watson, Jalen Ramsey. Highest active NFL values.

Hall of Fame

Highest Individual Agent Citation: Scott Boras, 88

Boras is the only individual agent who outscores the multi-sport conglomerates. His Citation Share (88) exceeds CAA (86), WME (78), and every other agency. $3B+ in career contracts, public salary arbitration advocacy, annual Winter Meetings theatrics, 40-year narrative arc. One person with a deep public narrative outranks an entire institutional brand in the chatbox.

Biggest Gap Between Agent and Agency: Rich Paul (82) vs. Klutch (74)

Rich Paul's personal citation share exceeds his own agency's by 8 points. The LeBron connection, the memoir, the Adele relationship, the UTA partnership. Remove Paul and LeBron and Klutch drops to an estimated 42 (D). Klutch is a one-entity agency in the chatbox.

Biggest Miss: NIL Agents — Invisible

The NIL advisory category — estimated at $1.17B in 2025 — has zero citation presence. Asked "best NIL agent," the engines return generic articles. The fastest-growing segment of sports representation is the least visible to AI engines.

The "Who Represents" Accuracy Test

Athlete TierChatGPTPerplexityGeminiAverage
Top 100 (by earnings)74%82%60%72%
Athletes 101-50038%42%22%34%

The engines know who represents the top 100. They don't know who represents anyone else. For any athlete outside the top 100, there is a ~66% chance the engine returns wrong or outdated agent information.

By Sport

SportTop AgencyScoreTop AgentScoreWhy
MLBBoras Corp82Scott Boras88Public salary arbitration = deepest archive
NFLCAA Football78Drew Rosenhaus72Draft + contract negotiations = public spectacle
NBAKlutch Sports74Rich Paul82Player movement + Rich Paul's cultural presence
Soccer (U.S.)CAA Base48Jorge Mendes38European-dominated; thin in U.S. engines
OlympicWasserman56Casey Wasserman56Olympic cycle = intermittent spikes

Biggest Winners

WinnerWhy
CAA across sportsOnly agency scoring A on all three engines across multiple sports.
Scott Boras individuallyCitation Share (88) exceeds every conglomerate. Public narrative is a retrieval moat.
Perplexity for "who represents"82% accuracy — 20+ points above Gemini. Real-time search wins on factual queries.
Agents with cultural narrativesRich Paul, Ari Emanuel, Jay-Z — stories beyond deals = higher citation than bigger client lists.

Biggest Risks

RiskWho It HurtsSeverity
66% error rate on athletes 101-500Brands, athletes seeking representationHigh
NIL category invisibleNIL agents, college athletes, collectivesHigh
Roc Nation overshadowed by musicRoc Nation SportsMedium
Contract vs. marketing agent confusionBrands calling the wrong agentMedium

Action Items by Audience

AudienceWhat This MeansWhat to Do
Sports AgentsYour AI profile shapes the consideration set before the phone rings.Publish deal announcements with named clients. Schema-mark your team page. Earn trade press.
AthletesThe engine answer is shaped by narrative, not results.Cross-reference with NFLPA/NBA agent registries. The chatbox is a starting point, not diligence.
Brand Marketers"Who represents [athlete]" is correct 72% for top-100. Below that, coin flip.Verify through league databases before endorsement outreach.
NIL AdvisorsYour entire category is invisible. Zero named advisors on any query.First-mover: publish NIL deal data + named profiles on open URLs. The seat is empty.

Predictions

NIL advisory firms enter the citation graph within 12 months. First firm to publish a named-deal database on an open URL owns the category answer — zero competition.

Perplexity becomes the default "who represents" engine. Real-time architecture + source links = structurally better for factual representation queries.

The agent-vs-agency gap widens. Agents with personal brands will continue to outrank their employers. The agent IS the brand in the chatbox.

Soccer agent citation share rises with the 2026 World Cup. U.S.-hosted tournament = massive English-language transfer and representation coverage. Mendes, CAA Base, Stellar Group enter the U.S. engine answer at scale.

Related: NFL Owners Reputation Index 2026 · Sports Betting AI Visibility Index · Citation Share: The KPI Behind GEO · GEO Pillar Hub


Methodology: 40 prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. June 2026. Five sports. Dual-rater, 91% agreement. Representation accuracy verified against Forbes, league registries, and agency press releases. Citation Share Score = citation frequency (60%) + cross-engine breadth (40%).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this index?

Everything-PR's measurement of which sports agencies and individual agents the AI engines cite.

Why does Boras score higher than WME and Klutch?

One person's 40-year public narrative with $3B+ in documented contracts creates a deeper archive than a multi-sport conglomerate. Deal volume is not Citation Share. Narrative density is.

How accurate are "who represents" answers?

72% for top-100 athletes. 34% for 101-500. Perplexity is the most accurate (82% top-100).

Why are NIL agents invisible?

The category didn't exist at scale before 2021. The engines need a citation archive of named agents, named deals, named athletes — and that archive barely exists.

EPR Editorial Team
Written by
EPR Editorial Team

The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.

Other news

See all

Most brands are invisible inside AI search. Is yours?

EPR publishes the data every week.

Free. Weekly. Unsubscribe anytime.