The internet is awash in both legitimate and “fake” celebrity nude photos. Some celebs “leak” these pics to grab some relevance or to help promote a new project. Others do it “just because” … but many, many celebs are embarrassed to have their privacy invaded when nudes are posted without their consent.
Such is the story for superstar actress Jennifer Lawrence of Hunger Games and X-men fame. When her obviously private and never intended for public consumption pics hit the net, the typically outspoken star was no less verbose. She called the hack and subsequent release of the photos on the net a “sex crime.” Many agreed with that assessment, but it didn’t stop millions from viewing or downloading the pics, against the express wishes of Lawrence and other stars, including Kaley Cuoco and Kirsten Dunst, who were targeted by the same hacker.
Now that hacker is looking at prison time. Ryan Collins, described in the media as “a 36-year-old father from Pennsylvania” has admitted to stealing the photos of Lawrence, Cuoco, Dunst and others. Prosecutors want Collins sent to prison for at least 18 months for his actions.
The plea highlights the dangers of phishing scams used to hack into phones and computers. Collins used official looking emails to trick his victims into giving up their account logins and passwords, allowing him to access their accounts and make their private information and images public. Collins allegedly posted those images to threads on 4Chan and Reddit, though he has not admitted to posting them, only taking them. While Reddit tried to expunge the photos from its site, those actions were too little too late. Once the internet has something, it’s all but impossible to make it disappear for good.
In addition to the invasion of privacy, there are other concerns in this case. Some of the celebrities exposed, including gymnast McKayla Maroney, were underage at the time, meaning her photos could qualify as child pornography.
But, as open and shut as this case may seem, Collins still may not do all the time prosecutors want. The phishing scam can connect him to the hack, but not to the posting. While prosecutors think he did it, they have yet to prove it.
This incident retreads the familiar ground of “what’s the line between public and private” in the life of a celebrity. Most people believe famous folks have the right to be as private as they see fit. Others seem to believe they have a “right” to whatever they want from that person because they’re a fan. Most people disagree, but that didn’t stop a lot of those people from looking at the images … even though they knew they shouldn’t.
Regardless of the various opinions on the matter and how they line up with people’s actions, celebrities must be aware that everything they do, even in private, can impact their public image. It’s a tough reality, but a true one.Crisis PR & Crisis Communications
By Editorial Team2 min read
Celebrity Hacker Who Stole Nudes Pleads Out
By Editorial Team2 min read
The internet is awash in both legitimate and “fake” celebrity nude photos. Some celebs “leak” these pics to grab some relevance or to help promote a new project. Others do it “just because” … but many, many celebs are embarrassed to have their privacy invaded when nudes are posted without their consent.
Such is the story for superstar actress Jennifer Lawrence of Hunger Games and X-men fame. When her obviously private and never intended for public consumption pics hit the net, the typically outspoken star was no less verbose. She called the hack and subsequent release of the photos on the net a “sex crime.” Many agreed with that assessment, but it didn’t stop millions from viewing or downloading the pics, against the express wishes of Lawrence and other stars, including Kaley Cuoco and Kirsten Dunst, who were targeted by the same hacker.
Now that hacker is looking at prison time. Ryan Collins, described in the media as “a 36-year-old father from Pennsylvania” has admitted to stealing the photos of Lawrence, Cuoco, Dunst and others. Prosecutors want Collins sent to prison for at least 18 months for his actions.
The plea highlights the dangers of phishing scams used to hack into phones and computers. Collins used official looking emails to trick his victims into giving up their account logins and passwords, allowing him to access their accounts and make their private information and images public. Collins allegedly posted those images to threads on 4Chan and Reddit, though he has not admitted to posting them, only taking them. While Reddit tried to expunge the photos from its site, those actions were too little too late. Once the internet has something, it’s all but impossible to make it disappear for good.
In addition to the invasion of privacy, there are other concerns in this case. Some of the celebrities exposed, including gymnast McKayla Maroney, were underage at the time, meaning her photos could qualify as child pornography.
But, as open and shut as this case may seem, Collins still may not do all the time prosecutors want. The phishing scam can connect him to the hack, but not to the posting. While prosecutors think he did it, they have yet to prove it.
This incident retreads the familiar ground of “what’s the line between public and private” in the life of a celebrity. Most people believe famous folks have the right to be as private as they see fit. Others seem to believe they have a “right” to whatever they want from that person because they’re a fan. Most people disagree, but that didn’t stop a lot of those people from looking at the images … even though they knew they shouldn’t.
Regardless of the various opinions on the matter and how they line up with people’s actions, celebrities must be aware that everything they do, even in private, can impact their public image. It’s a tough reality, but a true one.Written by
Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces reporting, research, and analysis across thirty verticals — communications, reputation, AI visibility, public affairs, media systems, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
Editorial Team · 05/26/2026
The 20 Best Technology PR Campaigns of 2026 — The New Playbook
The greatest campaigns of all time built categories, the best technology PR campaigns of 2026 are doing something more nuanced: They are building trust in an era of skepticism. AI fatigue, privacy concerns, and platform distrust have changed the rules. Visibility alone is no longer enough. Credibility is everything.
Editorial Team · 05/26/2026
AI Visibility as a Board-Level Metric
The first time a CEO asks a chief communications officer "do we show up in ChatGPT," the conversation that follows reveals more about the comms function than the question itself. The question is increasingly being asked. The answers vary in quality, in part because the discipline
Editorial Team · 05/26/2026
Cannabis Communications in the Schedule III Era
The DEA's Schedule III reclassification is the most consequential federal cannabis policy event since the modern legal industry began. The communications work that follows from it is correspondingly material.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.