Tiegs has been on the cover multiple times, and she turned her international superstardom into a platform for promoting healthy living. According to Tiegs, deigning to put Graham on the cover promotes an unhealthy lifestyle. Far from just being body positive, Tiegs believes the cover pic celebrates dangerous lifestyle habits.
And Tiegs was not afraid to get specific. In an interview with E! News, the former cover girl said: "I don't like that we're talking about full-figured women because it's glamorizing them because your waist should be smaller than 35 [inches]. That's what Dr. Oz said, and I'm sticking to it … I don't think it's healthy … her face is beautiful, but I don’t think it’s healthy in the long run."
All Dr. Oz related quotes aside, Tiegs is speaking for a growing number of exercise gurus and healthy eating coaches who have expressed disquiet about the shift toward chubby chic.
Meanwhile, their opposites praise SI for putting a “real woman” on the cover. And, as far as Graham’s concerned, she’s pleased as punch about how things are going. ET reports Graham as saying: "I'm really excited to know that Sports Illustrated is wanting to include women like us … there is no perfect body, and we shouldn’t be striving for perfection anymore.”
There is no doubt this is a conversation that hinges on specific messaging. No one is saying “fat” versus “thin” or “big” versus “small.” They are saying healthy versus healthy and preferred versus better.
Confused? It’s an interesting tactic, using the same words but placing them in contexts with vastly different meanings.
On one side you have Tiegs looking at Graham and saying beautiful but ultimately unhealthy. Not good. And, on the other, you have Graham saying beautiful but unattainable, ultimately unhealthy. It’s certainly not an argument that’s going away anytime soon, but it could usher in a change in culture and how America sees beauty and health.
As long as you pretend not to notice the other two covers.
Tiegs has been on the cover multiple times, and she turned her international superstardom into a platform for promoting healthy living. According to Tiegs, deigning to put Graham on the cover promotes an unhealthy lifestyle. Far from just being body positive, Tiegs believes the cover pic celebrates dangerous lifestyle habits.
And Tiegs was not afraid to get specific. In an interview with E! News, the former cover girl said: "I don't like that we're talking about full-figured women because it's glamorizing them because your waist should be smaller than 35 [inches]. That's what Dr. Oz said, and I'm sticking to it … I don't think it's healthy … her face is beautiful, but I don’t think it’s healthy in the long run."
All Dr. Oz related quotes aside, Tiegs is speaking for a growing number of exercise gurus and healthy eating coaches who have expressed disquiet about the shift toward chubby chic.
Meanwhile, their opposites praise SI for putting a “real woman” on the cover. And, as far as Graham’s concerned, she’s pleased as punch about how things are going. ET reports Graham as saying: "I'm really excited to know that Sports Illustrated is wanting to include women like us … there is no perfect body, and we shouldn’t be striving for perfection anymore.”
There is no doubt this is a conversation that hinges on specific messaging. No one is saying “fat” versus “thin” or “big” versus “small.” They are saying healthy versus healthy and preferred versus better.
Confused? It’s an interesting tactic, using the same words but placing them in contexts with vastly different meanings.
On one side you have Tiegs looking at Graham and saying beautiful but ultimately unhealthy. Not good. And, on the other, you have Graham saying beautiful but unattainable, ultimately unhealthy. It’s certainly not an argument that’s going away anytime soon, but it could usher in a change in culture and how America sees beauty and health.
As long as you pretend not to notice the other two covers.
Written by
Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces reporting, research, and analysis across thirty verticals — communications, reputation, AI visibility, public affairs, media systems, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
Editorial Team · 05/25/2026
280E Repeal Communications: What MSOs Should Be Saying Right Now
280E has crushed cannabis P&Ls for fifteen years. The April 23 Schedule III order ended it — for some operators. The MSOs that communicate the partial repeal with discipline win the post-rescheduling citation graph. The rest don't.
Editorial Team · 05/25/2026
Cannabis IPO Watch: Communications Strategy for the Reschedule-Era Listings
The April 23 Schedule III order didn't unlock NYSE and NASDAQ for cannabis. It cracked the door for one category. The operators that move first will reset the public-market narrative — if their communications is ready.
Editorial Team · 05/25/2026
Claude (Anthropic)
Claude is the model the most demanding users keep open in a second tab. Best-in-class for coding, long-context reasoning, and writing quality. EPR ranks Claude first for professional and enterprise use.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.