“This test is designed to address situations where neither social nor algorithmic signals are sufficient. For example, if you want to send a message to someone you heard speak at an event but are not friends with, or if you want to message someone about a job opportunity, you can use this feature to reach their Inbox. For the receiver, this test allows them to hear from people who have an important message to send them.”Does Facebook really think that all of its users are imbeciles? Does its arrogance know no bounds? Just days after it tried to sell off Instagram users’ photos to advertisers without any form of compensation - a move it later denied, insulting our intelligence by saying we were ‘confused’ by the new wording in its terms of service - Facebook is now effectively asking its users to pay to communicate with one another, ‘hinting’ that your messages could well end up being labeled ‘spam’ and ignored if you decide not to cough up. The world’s number one social media site is rapidly transforming into the world’s most anti-social website. Sure, we all welcome genuine efforts to reduce the amount of spam being funneled at us, but this latest move is anything but that. What Facebook is doing is not helping anyone, despite dressing it up as that. All Facebook wants is the money, but it could very well shoot itself in the foot and force people to seek different ways of communicating. After all, Facebook doesn’t exactly have the best reputation around - if it ever dared to ask me if I wanted to pay a fee to send a message, I can guarantee that my response would not be a very polite one, and I’m sure that MANY other users would feel exactly the same way. What’s even worse is that this new ‘feature’ would seem to have lots of potential for abuse. Facebook gives us the option to adjust our message settings so that we don’t have to see messages from non-friends. But given that we’re only offered two settings (basic and strict, neither of which guarantee we won’t receive any unwanted communications), it would appear that users now have the option to pay to override our spam filter and ensure that their messages are seen every single time. For sure, the relatively small fee won’t do a thing to dissuade the most obsessive of stalkers and weirdos out there.


The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces reporting, research, and analysis across thirty verticals — communications, reputation, AI visibility, public affairs, media systems, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
The Anatomy of an AI Answer
This article explores how AI answer engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews build responses, detailing the two main modes (trained knowledge and live retrieval), the six steps from question to answer, and the five factors that make a source rank highly. It also explains what determines which entities are named in an AI answer and offers five key takeaways for communications professionals on how to influence AI outputs.

AI Communications for Founders
AI Communications is the discipline of building authority across AI answer engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. This article explains why founders need a distinct AI Communications strategy, separate from their company's, to manage their personal reputation and influence the information presented to investors, recruits, journalists, and board members.

The Day Your Brand Disappears From ChatGPT
A thought experiment poses the scenario of a brand disappearing from ChatGPT, highlighting the critical need for AI Communications. This article outlines what happens when a brand isn't visible to AI, what can be done immediately, what should have been done six months ago, and three crucial next steps to build AI visibility infrastructure and avoid a crisis.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.
