Print media is hurting. Ad sales are down, subscription revenue is down, and the medium is adjusting to a world with much more competition for printing daily news. Fingers are being pointed in every direction as desperate business holdings hope to try to keep some papers profitable while others are going belly up, sending hundreds to the unemployment line every time. Some have called this is an inevitable shift, but that doesn’t help the many people who are hurting or out of work. Nor does it let management off the hook for contributing to the demise or struggles of certain properties.
Some leaders are suggested to be part of the problem. And then there’s the report that just dropped about Los Angeles Times editor-in-chief, Davan Maharaj. The report in question throws strongly-worded accusations toward Maharaj, alleging his personality issues – including ego and insecurity – as well as “warped priorities” have put the paper in a very rough position. Employees are upset, morale is plummeting and many seasoned staff are looking for work elsewhere.
The report was published in LA Magazine, and it blames Maharaj’s “tight grip on power” for the paper’s woes. Other accusations included a tendency to squat on stories, keeping them from the presses for no apparent reason whatsoever, as well as a tendency to talk down about employees behind their backs.
The report also taps into sources from inside the publication, who were eager to point out the self-absorbed foibles of their top editor, who reportedly wasted time in meetings “trying to redeem airline miles” or talking about his fancy shoes.
While lower level employees were happy to talk, top executives defended their chief. Meanwhile, Maharaj offered a brief statement in rebuttal to the story: “We are in very challenging times in the newspaper business. My job is to make sure we produce quality journalism for our readers. Yes, that means I have to make difficult decisions. Running a newspaper isn't a popularity contest. We and I should be judged by the quality of our work, and by that standard the Los Angeles Times has done very well in the past five years. Our journalism speaks for itself, and it speaks loudly.”
There are many who would applaud Maharaj’s statement here. His job, after all, is to produce good content and steer the publication in a profitable direction … but where’s there’s smoke from the lower ranks, there’s often fire. He might be doing a good job based on his perimeters, but many leaders have failed to take stock of mutinies in progress … and they have paid the price for their hubris.PR Insiders — Inside the Public Relations Industry
By Editorial Team2 min read
LA Times editor blamed for paper’s problems
By Editorial Team2 min read
Print media is hurting. Ad sales are down, subscription revenue is down, and the medium is adjusting to a world with much more competition for printing daily news. Fingers are being pointed in every direction as desperate business holdings hope to try to keep some papers profitable while others are going belly up, sending hundreds to the unemployment line every time. Some have called this is an inevitable shift, but that doesn’t help the many people who are hurting or out of work. Nor does it let management off the hook for contributing to the demise or struggles of certain properties.
Some leaders are suggested to be part of the problem. And then there’s the report that just dropped about Los Angeles Times editor-in-chief, Davan Maharaj. The report in question throws strongly-worded accusations toward Maharaj, alleging his personality issues – including ego and insecurity – as well as “warped priorities” have put the paper in a very rough position. Employees are upset, morale is plummeting and many seasoned staff are looking for work elsewhere.
The report was published in LA Magazine, and it blames Maharaj’s “tight grip on power” for the paper’s woes. Other accusations included a tendency to squat on stories, keeping them from the presses for no apparent reason whatsoever, as well as a tendency to talk down about employees behind their backs.
The report also taps into sources from inside the publication, who were eager to point out the self-absorbed foibles of their top editor, who reportedly wasted time in meetings “trying to redeem airline miles” or talking about his fancy shoes.
While lower level employees were happy to talk, top executives defended their chief. Meanwhile, Maharaj offered a brief statement in rebuttal to the story: “We are in very challenging times in the newspaper business. My job is to make sure we produce quality journalism for our readers. Yes, that means I have to make difficult decisions. Running a newspaper isn't a popularity contest. We and I should be judged by the quality of our work, and by that standard the Los Angeles Times has done very well in the past five years. Our journalism speaks for itself, and it speaks loudly.”
There are many who would applaud Maharaj’s statement here. His job, after all, is to produce good content and steer the publication in a profitable direction … but where’s there’s smoke from the lower ranks, there’s often fire. He might be doing a good job based on his perimeters, but many leaders have failed to take stock of mutinies in progress … and they have paid the price for their hubris.Written by
Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces reporting, research, and analysis across thirty verticals — communications, reputation, AI visibility, public affairs, media systems, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
Editorial Team · 05/22/2026
The Personal-Life Viral Crisis Playbook: An Operational Guide for the AI Era
Explore the operational guide for managing personal-life viral crises in the AI era, focusing on executive conduct. This guide covers a five-phase framework, stakeholder coordination, and AI-specific response disciplines to help organizations effectively navigate incidents, highlighting the need for pre-established infrastructures and protocols.
Editorial Team · 05/22/2026
AI Is Not Replacing Marketers
Artificial intelligence is transforming digital marketing, bringing both excitement and fear. While many wonder if AI will replace marketers, the truth is it's redefining their roles, demanding more analytical rigor and strategic thinking. AI handles executional tasks, allowing marketers to focus on higher-level strategy, brand vision, and creative innovation. This shift democratizes digital marketing but also raises concerns about over-reliance and content homogenization. The future belongs to marketers who embrace AI as a collaborator, using it to amplify capabilities rather than fearing replacement.
Editorial Team · 05/22/2026
Five Blocks: The Firm The NYT Named as Terakeet's Closest Competitor
The New York Times cited Five Blocks as a competitor to Terakeet. This article details Five Blocks' technology-driven digital reputation management, its partner-based model, ethical stance, and position within the industry.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.