The saying goes, “there a statistic for everything.” Case in point, a recent article was published on the Washington Redskins website and it showed that 58.1 million people read an article they posted. Oh wait, they really think that 7.8 billion unique visitors saw the article. Both of those numbers are a bit hard to swallow, especially the latter since there are not 7.8 billion people in the current world population. Having that many unique visitors would be impossible.
Here’s the story behind those numbers and the reason it is so difficult to tell by just the numbers what the actual results are from any given PR effort. Meltwater, a leading PR measurement company communication’s expert, Riana Dadlani, explained how the numbers are reached. In 2014, the team website ran coverage about their training camp from July 24 to August 12. The numbers they reported were actually just impressions. So that sounds pretty good right?
But, here’s the tricky part about the numbers they are reporting. They calculated viewer impressions when their article made it on one of the Internet’s search engines like Firefox or Google. Even for a few seconds. Then, they count it as having received the full possible unique viewership that particular search engine received during the full month. So, if it was on Page 1 of Google search for 10 seconds, they considered their article was viewed by every person who visited Google to search for something during the month. And, the numbers were calculated by tallying the totals from every search engine or major outlet that showed the story. If the story made it on a search engine more than one time during the month, the numbers got counted for each time.
To put this in perspective. If you have a business page on Facebook, you can see how many people might have seen a post. That number means how many people were on the site while your post was showing somewhere on their newsfeed. Not everyone who saw it read it.
That is a fairly reasonable way of assessing the information by most PR standards. However, using the way the Redskin’s PR team determined their numbers, it would be like saying the number of impressions was all of the people who were on FB during that month. And, if someone shared your post, they would count those numbers again. That would be a great day if it were true, or even potentially true, but it isn’t accurate. Nor, as the 7.8 billion number implies, is it even possible. You can read more about the PR firm’s explanation at Traffic-the-Entire-Earth.
It can be difficult enough to know what is happening with PR efforts in a rather complex digital world. But, when firms report unrealistic outcomes, you have to know it’s going to create a PR crisis down the defensive line somewhere.Marketing News & Digital Marketing Strategy
By Editorial Team2 min read
Measuring PR: It's Not That Easy
By Editorial Team2 min read
The saying goes, “there a statistic for everything.” Case in point, a recent article was published on the Washington Redskins website and it showed that 58.1 million people read an article they posted. Oh wait, they really think that 7.8 billion unique visitors saw the article. Both of those numbers are a bit hard to swallow, especially the latter since there are not 7.8 billion people in the current world population. Having that many unique visitors would be impossible.
Here’s the story behind those numbers and the reason it is so difficult to tell by just the numbers what the actual results are from any given PR effort. Meltwater, a leading PR measurement company communication’s expert, Riana Dadlani, explained how the numbers are reached. In 2014, the team website ran coverage about their training camp from July 24 to August 12. The numbers they reported were actually just impressions. So that sounds pretty good right?
But, here’s the tricky part about the numbers they are reporting. They calculated viewer impressions when their article made it on one of the Internet’s search engines like Firefox or Google. Even for a few seconds. Then, they count it as having received the full possible unique viewership that particular search engine received during the full month. So, if it was on Page 1 of Google search for 10 seconds, they considered their article was viewed by every person who visited Google to search for something during the month. And, the numbers were calculated by tallying the totals from every search engine or major outlet that showed the story. If the story made it on a search engine more than one time during the month, the numbers got counted for each time.
To put this in perspective. If you have a business page on Facebook, you can see how many people might have seen a post. That number means how many people were on the site while your post was showing somewhere on their newsfeed. Not everyone who saw it read it.
That is a fairly reasonable way of assessing the information by most PR standards. However, using the way the Redskin’s PR team determined their numbers, it would be like saying the number of impressions was all of the people who were on FB during that month. And, if someone shared your post, they would count those numbers again. That would be a great day if it were true, or even potentially true, but it isn’t accurate. Nor, as the 7.8 billion number implies, is it even possible. You can read more about the PR firm’s explanation at Traffic-the-Entire-Earth.
It can be difficult enough to know what is happening with PR efforts in a rather complex digital world. But, when firms report unrealistic outcomes, you have to know it’s going to create a PR crisis down the defensive line somewhere.Written by
Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces reporting, research, and analysis across thirty verticals — communications, reputation, AI visibility, public affairs, media systems, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
Editorial Team · 05/24/2026
How AI Platform Detection Changes Enterprise AI Buying
An enterprise AI procurement cycle after Hermes is a governance conversation. The capability questions still matter. They no longer differentiate. The questions that differentiate are now about what the platform reads, what it decides, and what happens when it gets the decision wrong. This piece is the operational guide to how that shift changes procurement, what to add to every RFP, and where to push back.
Editorial Team · 05/24/2026
Status Labs: Executive Reputation Management in the Era of AI Search
Status Labs, founded in 2012, is a prominent online reputation management and digital marketing firm. Known for elevating positive content to manage search results, the company is now pivoting to address the impact of AI chatbots on executive reputation. The firm has a history that includes both significant success and notable controversies, making its current adaptation a key case study in the evolving reputation management industry.
Editorial Team · 05/24/2026
When Multicultural Marketing Works, It Doesn’t Look Like Marketing at All
The most effective multicultural marketing in 2026 feels like culture, not marketing. Brands must move beyond surface-level inclusion to engage deeply with diverse audiences through cultural fluency, community-led storytelling, and relevant influencer partnerships. This approach drives innovation and cultural impact, making marketing disappear into the fabric of culture, rather than just being visible.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.