After criticism for their hasty return to profitability while the world still struggles to recover from the economic downturn, after paying 550 million US dollars to settle civil securities fraud charges related to their selling subprime mortgage securities, a new wave of negative PR hits Goldman Sachs as the investment bank has just been sued by three former employees who claim the firm systematically discriminates against women. The three plaintiffs claim Goldman Sachs intentionally pays female employees more than it pays male employees, and prefers men when it comes to promotions. This persistent pattern has caused women to be underrepresented in the investment bank’s management team. “The number of women in management positions at Goldman dwindles as the level of management rises,” the complaint quoted by CNBC (via New York Times), using Goldman data as proof to point out women made up 29 percent of the firm’s vice presidents, 17 percent of its managing directors and 14 percent of its partners. Goldman Sachs representatives claim there is no reason for such a lawsuit: “We believe this suit is without merit. People are critical to our business, and we make extraordinary efforts to recruit, develop and retain outstanding women professionals,” said Lucas van Praag, a Goldman spokesman. Goldman Sachs is not the only Wall Street firm to be confronted with such accusations. During the past decade, there have been quite a few law suits on the same issue of discrimination against women, with complaints targeting companies such as Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Beyond the actual lawsuits the reality is that there aren’t that many women executives at the top of Wall Street firms. Today’s most prominent female top executives include Sallie Krawchek, the head of global wealth and investment management at Bank of America; and Heidi Miller, head of international operations at JPMorgan Chase. The current accusations against Goldman Sachs range from lower payments for female employees to sexual harassment and increased hostility for female victims of such severely unprofessional behaviors. Regardless of how this turns out, the bad press is bound to take its toll on the already shaky image of Goldman Sachs. The gravity of the hit will be determined by the result of the lawsuit.
Written by
Editorial Team
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces reporting, research, and analysis across thirty verticals — communications, reputation, AI visibility, public affairs, media systems, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
Editorial Team · 05/26/2026
The 20 Best Technology PR Campaigns of 2026 — The New Playbook
The greatest campaigns of all time built categories, the best technology PR campaigns of 2026 are doing something more nuanced: They are building trust in an era of skepticism. AI fatigue, privacy concerns, and platform distrust have changed the rules. Visibility alone is no longer enough. Credibility is everything.
Editorial Team · 05/26/2026
AI Visibility as a Board-Level Metric
The first time a CEO asks a chief communications officer "do we show up in ChatGPT," the conversation that follows reveals more about the comms function than the question itself. The question is increasingly being asked. The answers vary in quality, in part because the discipline
Editorial Team · 05/26/2026
Cannabis Communications in the Schedule III Era
The DEA's Schedule III reclassification is the most consequential federal cannabis policy event since the modern legal industry began. The communications work that follows from it is correspondingly material.
Never Miss a Headline
Daily PR headlines, weekly long-form analysis, and our proprietary research drops — straight to your inbox.