Thanks to the volleying efforts of Facebook and Google to take over the world, we're in a bit of a privacy crisis right now. So how can you protect your brand? As consumers seek privacy, and brand recognition is becoming more associated with the proper use of consumer data, it's important to consider how you can organize your efforts around the changing perspectives.
The cause and effect
Facebook's rapid growth has enabled the company to roll out several changes to the core structure of its social network, making information more accessible to the public and more difficult for users to modify their privacy settings. Google is facing legal measures from German officials that are seeking the server on which the company was storing unauthorized consumer data, collected during one of its Street Views initiatives.
The result has been a media frenzy, discussing the growing disregard of consumer interests in the name of free web services. As Google and Facebook shift their efforts beyond the web, privacy group advocates, special interests groups and regulators continue to scrutinize the motifs and actions of each corporate entity.
As I've conjectured, there is a backlash under way, with Google and Facebook pushing some of their own initiatives onto consumers too quickly for their liking. It raises questions about the direction of each company, and threatens to make consumer data more vulnerable than ever before. This will continue to lead to more development of services and systems that overlap Facebook and Google with their own privacy measures, in some ways taking advantage of a new need.
From a marketing standpoint
For brands, the privacy backlash doesn't have to mean user distrust and a retreat from web-based activity. It means that those brands that can find a way to hedge their bets against any privacy backlash can be more successful. This is because they'll have found a better way in which to communicate with consumers, leveraging trust and service as their primary points of attraction.
As Facebook's instant personalization and Connect initiatives take the social experience outside the actual network, the activity around our consumer lives also become more social. A similar evolution is taking place with Google TV, as it looks to reorganize the on-demand media experience to be more tailored and interactive. This includes a move into the social realm, meaning there's an eventual and large overlap between what Facebook and Google are doing.
Making your brand a uniting factor of sorts increases the potential for long-term brand recognition, and enables you to build on that cross-network association. Several companies did this successfully after the initial bubble burst, when it was thought far less safe to share consumer data via the web. Google was one of those companies that restructured itself according to the needs of consumers, and ended up affecting what web privacy really means.
Considering these factors means you've looked to the past, present and future of consumer privacy needs. Recognizing the patterns of consumer and corporate behavior will help you to avoid backlash of your own, later on down the line. Technology brings about opportunity for any industry, and every applied frontier means a new implementation of privacy regulations.
We've gone from the bubble burst to web 2.0, and right on into the mobile realm. How can you structure your initiatives accordingly?
Thanks to the volleying efforts of Facebook and Google to take over the world, we're in a bit of a privacy crisis right now. So how can you protect your brand? As consumers seek privacy, and brand recognition is becoming more associated with the proper use of consumer data, it's important to consider how you can organize your efforts around the changing perspectives.
The cause and effect
Facebook's rapid growth has enabled the company to roll out several changes to the core structure of its social network, making information more accessible to the public and more difficult for users to modify their privacy settings. Google is facing legal measures from German officials that are seeking the server on which the company was storing unauthorized consumer data, collected during one of its Street Views initiatives.
The result has been a media frenzy, discussing the growing disregard of consumer interests in the name of free web services. As Google and Facebook shift their efforts beyond the web, privacy group advocates, special interests groups and regulators continue to scrutinize the motifs and actions of each corporate entity.
As I've conjectured, there is a backlash under way, with Google and Facebook pushing some of their own initiatives onto consumers too quickly for their liking. It raises questions about the direction of each company, and threatens to make consumer data more vulnerable than ever before. This will continue to lead to more development of services and systems that overlap Facebook and Google with their own privacy measures, in some ways taking advantage of a new need.
From a marketing standpoint
For brands, the privacy backlash doesn't have to mean user distrust and a retreat from web-based activity. It means that those brands that can find a way to hedge their bets against any privacy backlash can be more successful. This is because they'll have found a better way in which to communicate with consumers, leveraging trust and service as their primary points of attraction.
As Facebook's instant personalization and Connect initiatives take the social experience outside the actual network, the activity around our consumer lives also become more social. A similar evolution is taking place with Google TV, as it looks to reorganize the on-demand media experience to be more tailored and interactive. This includes a move into the social realm, meaning there's an eventual and large overlap between what Facebook and Google are doing.
Making your brand a uniting factor of sorts increases the potential for long-term brand recognition, and enables you to build on that cross-network association. Several companies did this successfully after the initial bubble burst, when it was thought far less safe to share consumer data via the web. Google was one of those companies that restructured itself according to the needs of consumers, and ended up affecting what web privacy really means.
Considering these factors means you've looked to the past, present and future of consumer privacy needs. Recognizing the patterns of consumer and corporate behavior will help you to avoid backlash of your own, later on down the line. Technology brings about opportunity for any industry, and every applied frontier means a new implementation of privacy regulations.
We've gone from the bubble burst to web 2.0, and right on into the mobile realm. How can you structure your initiatives accordingly?
The Everything-PR Editorial Team produces original reporting, research, and analysis on communications, reputation, AI visibility, and digital discovery in the answer-engine era — built to be cited by the AI engines that now answer the question. Publishing since 2009.
Other news
See all
The Pet Industry Citation Share Index 2026
Modeled Citation Share across 25 pet brands and 5 AI engines. Chewy #1. The Farmer's Dog #2. Mars Petcare brands cluster in the top 10. BarkBox the strongest creator-driven brand. The 2026 baseline.

Pet Industry: EPR's Coverage of Chewy, BarkBox, The Farmer's Dog, Petco, and the $150B U.S. Pet Economy
The U.S. pet economy crossed $150B in 2024. Chewy, BarkBox, The Farmer's Dog, Petco, PetSmart, Mars Petcare, Nestlé Purina. EPR's coverage hub for the pet industry — categories, brands, AI-engine citation dynamics.

The Creator Holding Company Index: After Beast Industries
Sidemen, Dude Perfect, Barstool, Unwell Network, Morning Brew. Five creator holding companies indexed against the integrated vs distributed framework — the follow-up to the Beast Industries case at $5 billion.
Most brands are invisible inside AI search. Is yours?
EPR publishes the data every Wednesday.
Free. Wednesdays. Unsubscribe anytime.
