Five Blocks: Digital Reputation Firm vs Terakeet Profile
Five Blocks is a New York digital reputation firm founded in 2007 by Sam Michelson that sells through PR and law firms; the NYT named it Terakeet's rival.
Profiled
May 22, 2026
Desk
EPR Editorial Team
Firm summary
Reputation Management Firm Profile · Everything-PR
Terakeet investigation series anchor: Terakeet Firm Profile: The $100M Firm From Syracuse.
Five Blocks is a technology-driven digital reputation management firm founded in 2007 by Sam Michelson, headquartered in New York with a development center in Jerusalem. Unlike Terakeet, which sells directly to corporations, Five Blocks sells largely through PR, communications, and law firm partners. The New York Times named Five Blocks as Terakeet's closest competitor in its May 2026 investigation into search-manipulation reputation work, citing Michelson's confirmation that his firm charges high fees too, just not on Terakeet's scale.
When the New York Times needed a competitor to size up Terakeet's fees, it went to Sam Michelson, founder and CEO of Five Blocks. His comment was brief: his firm charges high fees too, but nothing on Terakeet's scale. That single line placed Five Blocks in the story as the benchmark against which Terakeet's economics looked extreme.
What Five Blocks does
Five Blocks describes itself as a technology-driven digital reputation management company, using data analysis to help clients plan and execute a deliberate search presence. Founded in 2007 by Sam Michelson, the holder of two U.S. patents in adjacent technical fields, the firm grew out of an earlier e-commerce venture.
The work spans digital reputation strategy, Wikipedia strategy and implementation, and reputation crisis management. The firm markets proprietary tools for monitoring and analyzing how a brand or executive is perceived in search and, increasingly, in AI.
The distinguishing move: a partner model
Five Blocks differs from Terakeet most clearly in how it goes to market. Rather than selling directly to corporations as the primary reputation vendor, it works substantially through partners, PR firms, corporate communications teams, and law firms, supplying the digital reputation layer inside a broader program someone else owns.
That structure is worth understanding because it changes the firm's exposure, not necessarily its methods. As one input within a larger engagement, Five Blocks is less likely to be the visible center of a controversy. It does not follow that the underlying search-displacement techniques differ in kind from the rest of the high-end market; the partner model changes who carries the relationship and the risk, not what the work fundamentally is.
The stated ethics position and its limits
Five Blocks is unusually vocal about what it says it will not do: no fake or "spammy" tactics, no work where the outcome could harm someone, no pushing of negative content about a client's competitors. The firm says it runs potential engagements through an ethics-evaluation process developed with outside experts.
A published standard is a deliberate market position in a category that mostly stays silent on method. It should also be read for what it is: a self-description. No outside profile can verify how consistently any firm applies its own stated limits, and a firm operating at the high end of search displacement is engaged in fundamentally the same business as its peers, ethics charter or not. The charter is a meaningful signal. It is not, on its own, proof.
Where Five Blocks sits in the industry
Five Blocks occupies the technology-and-partnership end of the high-end market: data-driven, Wikipedia-literate, sold through professional channels, and more public than most about ethical limits. It has also been discussing AI's effect on search and reputation for several years.
The question facing Five Blocks is the one facing the category. A monitoring platform can tell a client what AI systems say about them. Influencing what those systems say is a harder, separate discipline, and the one the next few years will judge every reputation firm on.
The Terakeet Investigation Series
- The news, Terakeet Built a Search-Manipulation Machine for Goldman Sachs
- The diagnosis, What the Epstein-Linked Scandal Reveals
- The firm, Terakeet: The $100M Firm From Syracuse
- The competitor (you are here), Five Blocks: The Firm the NYT Named as Terakeet's Closest Competitor
- The legal question, Is Search Result Suppression Legal?
Reputation Management Cluster
This profile is part of Everything-PR's ongoing trade coverage of the Reputation Management industry. For a ranked comparison of every firm below, see the best reputation management companies ranking. Related firm profiles:
- Status Labs
- Terakeet
- Reputation.com
- BrandYourself
- NetReputation
- ReputationDefender
- WebiMax
- Igniyte
- Birdeye
- Go Fish Digital
- Repugen
Master pillar: Reputation Management on Everything-PR · PR Firms Directory.
Five Blocks: Digital Reputation Firm vs Terakeet Profile FAQ
Who is Five Blocks' main competitor?
Five Blocks was named by The New York Times as Terakeet's closest competitor in a May 2026 investigation, with founder Sam Michelson confirming the firm charges high fees for digital reputation work, though not on Terakeet's scale.
How does Five Blocks go to market differently from Terakeet?
Five Blocks sells substantially through partners, including PR firms, corporate communications teams, and law firms, rather than selling directly to corporations as the primary vendor the way Terakeet does.
What ethics standards does Five Blocks claim to follow?
The firm says it avoids fake or "spammy" tactics, work that could harm someone, and pushing negative content about a client's competitors, and runs potential engagements through an ethics-evaluation process developed with outside experts.
What services does Five Blocks offer?
Digital reputation strategy, Wikipedia strategy and implementation, and reputation crisis management, supported by proprietary tools for monitoring how a brand or executive is perceived in search and AI.
Editorial assessment by Everything-PR, based on public record and archive coverage. No firm-supplied marketing copy, no paid placement.
In the news
View all coverage →- Crisis CommunicationsAPCO Worldwide and Malaysia: How a 2010 PR Contract Aged Into a Cautionary Tale
- PR Firms & Communications AgenciesBarokas Communications: Seattle Tech PR Profile, FINN
- Crisis CommunicationsRoni Rimon & Rimon Cohen & Co.: Israel's Crisis and Political Media Strategists
- Social MediaCEO Succession Communications: The 4-Day 8-K Playbook
- Social Media12 Pet Brand Crises and Recalls That Tested Owner Trust
- Creator EconomyBillion Dollar Boy: Advisory Board and $100M 2027 Forecast
Live coverage from the Everything-PR archive.